Win Hill: Inverse Marx Generator ??

Being unaware of the common usage of the term 'clip' to refer to the removable magazine is quite a tell. It has only been in use for several decades, and is not incorrect to use in this context.

No, idiot, nobody was referring to speed loader clips.

And if you want to continue in this vein, the only conclusion I can arrive at is that you are a thick skulled, retarded pig.

It figures, looking back at the horseshit you post. That or a wanna be.

Reply to
My Name Is Tzu How Do You Do
Loading thread data ...

Archie, they use YOU as the definition of Skank. Has your family forgiven you for getting your sister pregnant yet?

mike

Reply to
m II

The biggest retard to ever invade sci.electronics.design is this mike retard.

Sorry, mike, but all the morphing baby bullshit in the world will not delete the original post.

Your mother should have been a murder victim... Before you were drizzled down her leg.

Reply to
TheKraken

message=20

charge

"energy",

way

so

calculus

of=20

Tell that to the designers of the GPS system.

Reply to
JosephKK

How does E=mc^2 relate to GPS?

John

Reply to
John Larkin

HAHahahahhaa! Pretty funny, and so true!

Reply to
WarmUnderbelly

Sorry, JF that is weak.

Reply to
JosephKK

one

unit of

a

event.

are.

I understand your will to forgiveness. It is the same poster with some newfound civility. Still just as tiresome in the same way. You seem to have issues with JL. Maybe you might consider not ragging on him.

Reply to
JosephKK

You and Obama are both proof that simply having a degree does not make one an intelligent, mature adult. Not by a long shot.

I think we are all Bozos on this bus. Some just more than others.

Reply to
The_Giant_Rat_of_Sumatra

Archie > Now you are being nothing more than a pissy little bitch.

Archie, We are still assessing you.

Reply to
Greegor

unless

this

Some do. Not all.

Reply to
JosephKK

I had to dig up L.O. Chua et al. "Linear and Nonlinear Circuits" which is the reference for "unusual" circuits.

start quote

In elementary circuit courses,

a) the capacitor is defined by i=C·dv/dt where C is a constant called the capacitance.

b) the inductor is defined by v=L·di/dt where L is a constant called the inductance.

These definitions ara valid only if the elements are linear and time-invariant. To generalize these definitions to the nonlinear and possibly time-varying case , it is necessary to invoke the following dual variables:

a) The charge q associated with a two-terminal element at any time t is defined by q=integral(-inf,t)(i(t)dt where i denotes the branch current. The unit of charge is the coulomb.

...

end quote

For time-varying circuits, charge and flux are _the_ variables to be used.

This may provide some light here.

Pere

Reply to
oopere

I had to dig up L.O. Chua et al. "Linear and Nonlinear Circuits" which is the reference for "unusual" circuits.

start quote

In elementary circuit courses,

a) the capacitor is defined by i=C·dv/dt where C is a constant called the capacitance.

b) the inductor is defined by v=L·di/dt where L is a constant called the inductance.

These definitions ara valid only if the elements are linear and time-invariant. To generalize these definitions to the nonlinear and possibly time-varying case , it is necessary to invoke the following dual variables:

a) The charge q associated with a two-terminal element at any time t is defined by q=integral(-inf,t)(i(t)dt where i denotes the branch current. The unit of charge is the coulomb.

...

end quote

For time-varying circuits, charge and flux are _the_ variables to be used.

This may provide some light here.

Pere

Reply to
oopere

Hi John.

Just trying to give some insight. q(t) is _defined_ (see my previous post and the reference therein) as the integral of i(t) for _any_ two-terminal element. For a capacitor it only equals C·v(t) if C is time-invariant.

If C is time-varying, i(t)=C(t)·dv(t)/dt+dC(t)/dt·v(t). In this case, for instance, a discontinuity in C(t) causes an impulse in i(t) which may be overlooked.

Pere

Reply to
o pere o

--
You have to watch that tricky Larkin and his definitions, so since his
question was ludicrous on its face, I chose "disharged" not to mean
"totally discharged", so my answer still stands.

Of course, if the resistor were to remain on the cap forever, the
correct, confusion-free answer would be: "one coulomb."
Reply to
John Fields

--
First hit from Googling "GPS and relativity":

http://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/~pogge/Ast162/Unit5/gps.html
Reply to
John Fields

--
Maybe...

JF
Reply to
John Fields

You must be a software guy originally. Conservation laws are mathematical expressions of the basic symmetries of all physical processes. If that weren't the case, you couldn't make up things that were conserved, except trivial ones, like velocity to the zeroth power.

Cheers

Phil Hobbs

--
Dr Philip C D Hobbs
Principal
ElectroOptical Innovations
55 Orchard Rd
Briarcliff Manor NY 10510
845-480-2058
hobbs at electrooptical dot net
http://electrooptical.net
Reply to
Phil Hobbs

Dr. Phil Hobbs, I have to send you back to the course of physics by R. Feynman. You definitely need a refresher on the basics.

Vladimir Vassilevsky DSP and Mixed Signal Design Consultant

formatting link

Reply to
Vladimir Vassilevsky

My dear weapon expert,

Even the leftiest of weenies can understand the difference between a mag and a clip, and also between assault rifles, SMGs and machineguns...

VLV

Reply to
Vladimir Vassilevsky

ElectronDepot website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.