Can you be a little more specific? I don't recall the Scepter-gate incident.
What you call "ignoring" is by the constitution, defining what is constitutional. I'll agree the SCOTUS seems to rule badly sometimes, but I bet we don't agree on which cases those are.
I think it was a mistake to rule for eminent domain for economic development. I think it was a mistake to certify civil forfeiture. I think it was a mistake to rule that companies are "people" for the purpose of campaign contributions. How about you?
As to the origin of the bill for Obamacare, I expect the suit against it did not raise that point. Maybe they should sue again based on that point of law? That would certainly create chaos if it were enforced. Likely I would guess the SCOTUS would rule this is an issue in the Congress and once signed into law it is too late to do anything about it, but maybe not. You can sue over this issue. Go for it!
--
| James E.Thompson | mens |
| Analog Innovations | et |
| Analog/Mixed-Signal ASIC's and Discrete Systems | manus |
| San Tan Valley, AZ 85142 Skype: skypeanalog | |
| Voice:(480)460-2350 Fax: Available upon request | Brass Rat |
| E-mail Icon at http://www.analog-innovations.com | 1962 |
I love to cook with wine. Sometimes I even put it in the food.
The target audience would seem to be equally psychopathic right-wing nut ca ses. S.e.d isn't short of them. This is, of course, distinct from that part of t he audience who might feel themselves to be potential targets of Jim's psyc hopathic impulses, who are aware that psychopaths don't choose their target s all that rationally or predictably.
MentallyDeficientLoserNumeroUno s**ts from his mouth yet again. ...Jim Thompson
--
| James E.Thompson | mens |
| Analog Innovations | et |
| Analog/Mixed-Signal ASIC's and Discrete Systems | manus |
| San Tan Valley, AZ 85142 Skype: skypeanalog | |
| Voice:(480)460-2350 Fax: Available upon request | Brass Rat |
| E-mail Icon at http://www.analog-innovations.com | 1962 |
I love to cook with wine. Sometimes I even put it in the food.
It was interesting to see the explanation by Michael Bloomberg about him abandoning his plan to run as a third party candidate.
The problem with his plan was that he would have gained a lot of votes from moderate Democrats and moderate Republicans, but there are a lot more moderate Democrats than moderate Republicans, so he would have been taking a lot of votes away from Clinton, guaranteeing a Trump or Cruz victory in November. Now the moderate Republicans are either going to have to not vote at all, or vote for Clinton, because there is no way that they would vote for Trump or Cruz.
In a Clinton versus Trump match-up, Clinton will likely win. A Clinton-Cruz match-up is a toss-up because Cruz is slightly less odious than Trump to mainstream Republicans, but only slightly.
Personally, I think Trump is less odious than Cruz since a) he is pro-choice, b) he favored the nuclear deal with Iran, c) he is not an evangelical Christian, d) he admitted that George W. Bush lied regarding WMDs, e) he supported amnesty and the Dream Act.
When running for the Republican nomination you have to pander to the psychopathic right-wing nut cases and evangelicals. Trump has done this better than any other candidate, but if you look at his history, he doesn't actually believe any of garbage he's spewing.
Trump has also had a lot of praise for Hillary:
"I know Hillary and I think she?d make a great president."
He also praised her performance as Secretary of State, and all the experts agree that she was one of the best Secretary of States in modern U.S. history.
Some people insist that the Clintons recruited Trump to run to stop any electable moderate Republican from winning the Republican nomination. This seems far-fetched, but it's still inconceivable that any voters other than the psychopathic right-wing nut cases and evangelicals would vote for Trump in November.
But the numbers don't lie, eh? There must be a *lot* of right-wing nut cases out there...
No, it's not just the nut jobs that are voting for Trump. But mostly it is the less educated who listen to his words without hearing what he is saying... nothing. The video I posted a link to shows pretty clearly how his way of speaking that is attracting voters more so than what he is saying.
Hillary is even worse. At least there is hope the the clown doesn't actually mean everything he says, but you can be certain that Clinton does not mean a word she says.
The Republican professional politicians (aka "establishment") are guaranteeing Hillary's election by sand-bagging Trump. ...Jim Thompson
--
| James E.Thompson | mens |
| Analog Innovations | et |
| Analog/Mixed-Signal ASIC's and Discrete Systems | manus |
| San Tan Valley, AZ 85142 Skype: skypeanalog | |
| Voice:(480)460-2350 Fax: Available upon request | Brass Rat |
| E-mail Icon at http://www.analog-innovations.com | 1962 |
I love to cook with wine. Sometimes I even put it in the food.
ElectronDepot website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here.
All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.