Independent MPs Rob Oakeshott and Tony Windsor have backed Labor to govern Australia, with both saying the national broadband network was critical to their decisions.
The nation stopped for the announcement, which was broadcast live nationally at
3pm AEST.
Windsor said there was an "enormous opportunity for regional Australians to engage with infrastructure of this century".
"To pass up that opportunity and miss the opportunity for a million people of country Australia ... I thought [it] was too good an opportunity to miss," Windsor said.
formatting link
Cheers Don...
========================
--
Don McKenzie
Site Map: http://www.dontronics.com/sitemap
I don't think Windsor has enough brains to understand what he has actually voted for. For a farmer or someone in a small community that doesn't have broadband at all, NBN will do absolutely nothing.
For someone in many small communities that only have ADSL1, NBN will do absolutely nothing.
NBN will only provide ultra-fast broadband to people who live in major centres, not the rural people that Windsor claims to support. And it will do so at a cost of $5000 per household (paid indirectly through tax), whether they want it or not.
But the thing is, those who want/need those sort of speeds now, and who live in larger communities can get those speeds now, through either multiple-line ADSL2, or through fibre. They have to pay for the privilege of course. But why should the many people who don't even have dial-up internet, because they don't want any internet, pay through the nose, so the handful of people who do want ultra-fast broadband can have it?
Furthermore, when copper lines are removed, how will it benefit the population when they no longer have a simple and reliable POTS? For a great many of the elderly (and probably a large portion of the rest of the community too), they don't give a rats arse about ultra-fast broadband, they just want a telephone that is cheap and reliable. NBN will take that away from them.
Like everything else the ALP does, it is poorly thought through, and sold with lies.
If we go back to what the NBN was really meant to be - can we remember that?
I recall that the whole thing about the NBN was to achieve a single hardware 'truck' provider like the old STC was [before they made Telecom with it. The idea of Telstra giving up it's cables, trenches, conduits etc is to have a single carrier period. After which all retail bods rent the 'landlines' and so away we go.
Yep, it was the dud's attempt to bullshit his way out of his predicament when his 007 election promise of putting the FTTN out to competitive tended produced NOT ONE viable tenderer.
'truck' provider like the old STC was
Wrong. And there was no STC either, there was the PMG before Telecom.
single carrier period.
That was never part of the NBN initially.
Yep, you dont have a clue about how the NBN actually got started.
He appears to be mostly driven by a much better prospect of the NBN with Labor given that the coalition said very unambiguously that they would kill it, and decided that the coalition would have another election as soon as the polls looked promising and he would have to find the money for his own election campaign.
Katter was too stupid to even consider that sort of thing.
all,
Thats nothing like your previous lie about 'that doesn't have broadband at all'
You can get a hell of a lot more than just MBs for $40.
ElectronDepot website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here.
All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.