Re: Moving to new form of usenet ideas?

"of is"??? You aren't drunk, you're damaged goods.

Seems to be all you can afford.

All that seems to be obvious is you're a dyslexic grammarian and not very much of the latter.

I'd rather have a drink.

~v~~

Usually I prefer truth.

~v~~

It worked for Samuel Johnson.

Obviously.

Always drunk and always true.

~v~~

Well truth certainly isn't your fault.

~v~~

In other words unless you're dealing with truth.

~v~~

Personally I find a simple period sufficient unto the day for the usenet manual of style.

~v~~

They were talking about AFTER the period, you retarded dingledorf!

bud

Kelvin?

LOL. Don't worry, Captain Obvious. My lips are sealed. I'll never reveal your secret identity, inept dyslexic grammarian by day, total babbling idiot by night. Your secret is safe. Good luck on your next mission.

~v~~

Well, that didn't take long.

In which case, oh ChairmanOfTheDorks, you can simply elide the "is" when you eventually matriculate to fifth grade reading comprehension.

~v~~

Faculty advisor? Can't say as I've owned one either. See, the problem here, oh Chairman of the dorks, is that in science we prefer to state definitive rationale for what we say. And despite our appreciation for your unadorned opinions we find they contribute far more to the anals of science than its annals.

~v~~

Whereas I was talking about after YOUR period, oh Chairman of the dorks.

~v~~

Well better luck with your next mainstay.

Then he's a worse grammarian than I realized.

~v~~

I know. But it's the best I could do at your level.

~v~~