No, but Reagan said: "Approximately 80 percent of our air pollution stems from hydrocarbons released by vegetation."
No, but Reagan said: "Approximately 80 percent of our air pollution stems from hydrocarbons released by vegetation."
yeah something like that.
yes, but they're not more efficient than incandescent.
OTOH if there's a chemical process that produces light directly (rather than by incandescence) that'd probably be the winner.
Bye. Jasen
He did claim responsibility for it though, which was absurd enough.
-- Keith
Cite! He did say that forests contribute to pollution, which is correct (see: Smokey Mountains).
-- Keith
If you read the actual words, he claimed to have financed it.
In sci.math, jasen
wrote >> >>>>> No, warmer air due to lighting makes the thermostat kick on
Assuming the chemical can be produced with less energy than using incandescent bulbs, fluorescent bulbs, or LEDs. There is also the issue of feeding the reagents into the light, and discarding the reaction products.
The best I can do here is luciferin or luciferinase, an enzyme used by many animals (fireflies [family Lampyridae] probably being the best known, but presumably it's also used by deep sea creatures). Presumably the other reagent in the reaction is oxygen, though according to
other atoms are also involved -- the example shows calcium.
After the chemical produces light it needs to be "reset", presumably by additional energy input and/or another chemical reaction -- or more reagents added into the light bulb.
-- #191, ewill3@earthlink.net Windows Vista. Because a BSOD is just so 20th century; why not try our new color changing variant?
well, authorised the finance, ultimately they were tax dollars.
Bye. Jasen
I have watched people fill the auto gas tank. Despite all warnings I've seen men and women hanging onto a cigarette while doing so.
I think the 'if' in your sentence should be spelled IFF.
/BAH
the
running
I'd go bonkers in your office. I always had the flurescent bulbs above my office taken out. I could see their flicker even though no one else could.
/BAH
It was a fee which keeps going up and up and up and up. What was important about the bill he co-sponsored was to lift the wall between defense and commercial net pathing. Then the real work could begin.
/BAH
Everybody needs solar power! It is very correct statement that CFL saves
80% power but they cost whopping 3-4 times the GLS lamps. Also the ones which save 80% have electronics ballasts and those costing 2-3 times have somewhat 'electrical' types. They save only 40% power. & slow to give full output. Whereas I used to switch on 40W bulb for dim lighting the room where I got the PC, now I use only 8W CFL and get better light also save so much power. In fact I have replaced all 'zero' bulbs (15W) with 5Watt CFL and they are good and truly ZERO! Many chinese devices are available which use these CFL and once charged for 8hrs give 5Hrs lighting for 6days! So now U know who needs solar !
I'm confused. Six of my days is more than 5 hours long. Am I in a time warp and didn't know it?
/BAH
It existed before he was in congress. He lied (again), is the point.
-- Keith
Did you see in the papers where Merriam-Webster's word of the year is "truthiness"?
On 10 Dec 2006 09:35:53 -0800, in sci.electronics.design "Richard Henry" wrote: int.
anyone got an url for the colbert "truthiness" video? It's been un-youtubed
martin
No video, but wikipedia has the transcript.
In sci.math, snipped-for-privacy@aol.com
wrote on Sun, 10 Dec 06 12:11:14 GMT :
There is some good news. The old movie cliche about tossing a butt into a pool of gasoline is just that: an old movie cliche.
However, under the right conditions -- the subtext describes a tube filled with pure oxygen and a few drops of gasoline, with an ignition source (a cigarette, natch) -- kaboom. But apparently it takes some doing, and while O2 tanks are available for medical use they're not all that common, especially when refueling cars. :-)
Not that I smoke anyway.
-- #191, ewill3@earthlink.net Windows Vista. Because a BSOD is just so 20th century; why not try our new color changing variant?
What he said was carefully crafted to give the impression that he is responsible, while allowing plausible deniability. Therefore he is a liar.
-- Michael Press
It takes an inifinite number, Since we valled flourescent lighting tubes for the simple reason so that moron bio-chemist retard wouldn't get shocked br the invariant frequency effects, and we called the connectors ballast pin-outs so that global warming moorons like Gore Quantum Crapola wouldn't confuse them with Nova Station Break Pinups.
That's not a misspelling. It's a forcing function inserted lower case "U". (YOO is Swahili) for Physics Telsa Coil retards who can't understand how you spell "Uranium Hexa-Flouride".
ElectronDepot website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.