So... Because something looks simple, you cannot appreciate its usefulness? "It needs gadgetry. It must be complex!" Maybe that's why you didn't think of it in the first place.
An intelligent person might not be able to develop a better method, but he should at least be able to recognize a better method when he sees it. He should be able to see the benefit of using a simple and effective method for tying up wire, that does not require tools or ties.
Take a wire of whatever sort that is about 4 feet long. Fold it in half. Fold it in half again. Now it is 1 foot long. Grab both ends and tie an overhand knot. That's it. It stays stuck together in a much more compact and easy to manage form. The same method can be used for tying up the ends of wires that are currently being used (plugged in at both ends) by doing as described above with the folded excess wire.
formatting link
That one is more to the point, but if it don't work...
You are kidding, right? Are you really trying to claim this is new, and that YOU thought of it?
Bwuahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaa!
STOP top posting, you retarded f*ck. And go back to the kook group, you are not welcome here, nor is your pathetic attempt to show folks that your IQ exceeds 20 by a few points.
I am NOT going to your pathetic link, and I am certainly not going to hunt up your pathetic dress method. Get a clue, asswipe. You ain't all that, and you never was, and you certainly never will be.
Get over the plain and simple fact that you are an utter loser, boy!
Go back to the kook group, and get the f*ck OUT of here, and STOP being a retarded top-posting Usenet twit! It really is that simple, boy.
The fact that you cut and paste your pathetic post text OVER and OVER and OVER is further proof that you are nothing more than a dopey little bitch in an attention seeking endeavor. You take "pathetic fool" to an all new low.
An intelligent person might not be able to develop a better method, but he (someone who is not inhibited by his own big ego) should at least be able to recognize a better method when he sees it, he should be able to see the benefit of using a simple and effective method that does not require tools or ties.
Take a wire of whatever sort that is about 4 feet long. Fold it in half. Fold it in half again. Now it is 1 foot long. Grab both ends and tie an overhand knot. That's it. It stays stuck together in a much more compact and easy to manage form. The same method can be used for tying up the ends of wires that are currently being used (plugged in at both ends) by doing as described above with the excess wire.
formatting link
That one is more to the point, but if it don't work...
An intelligent person might not be able to develop a better method, but he (someone who is not inhibited by his own big ego) should at least be able to recognize a better method when he sees it, he should be able to see the benefit of using a simple and effective method that does not require tools or ties.
Take a wire of whatever sort that is about 4 feet long. Fold it in half. Fold it in half again. Now it is 1 foot long. Grab both ends and tie an overhand knot. That's it. It stays stuck together in a much more compact and easy to manage form. The same method can be used for tying up the ends of wires that are currently being used (plugged in at both ends) by doing as described above with the excess wire.
formatting link
That one is more to the point, but if it don't work...
Holy cow... I'm in the middle of a flame war over whether tying wire into an overhand know is an original, creative idea.
You know that theory that, if you had a bunch of monkeys typing randomly, eventually they'd produce the works of Shakespeare? Well, Usenet has proved that it's not true.
--
C is quirky, flawed, and an enormous success
-- Dennis M. Ritchie
ElectronDepot website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here.
All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.