--
Since he wrote "federales" (a slang term for the Mexican Federal Police)
one can only infer that he was referring to legal authorities, if only
in a jocular vein.
Had he been referring to the physics in the same vein I suspect he would
have written something like "Because the physicos will get you?"
He did not, however, so we're left with the fact that the response he
offered was one referring to legal authority, which is what you bought
into.
Later on, however, you were horrified to find that Lenz wasn't quite the
cup of tea you thought he was, so you changed streams in mid-horse ever
so deftly in an attempt to cover up your fox paws.
But, too late... the damage was done
My wife tells me that I am a paradoxical bad speller - which reflects a particular reading strategy, which is associated with a very high reading rate. It's not any kind of indication of idiocy - quite the reverse.
The second vowel in "category" is unstressed, which means that what one hears is a "schwa" which would be the same whatever vowel was present in the orthographic representation.
A google search on "catagory" throws up 2,260,000 hits, which makes it a pretty popular error. The correct spelling throws up 1,110,000,000 hits, so "catagory" isn't actually an acceptable variant, and to that
- very limited - extent your comment has merit.
Grown-ups don't get excited about typos, and people who understand how the brain works are aware that typos don't reflect any kind of underlying problem - the brain, like any other signal processing system, has to make a compromise between error rate and the time spent on error checking, so normal human performance is tpproduce some kind of error of action roughly every half hour. For programmers, that is roughly one error per thirty lines of code.
Drinking a beer or being a bit tired raises the error rate without actually disrupting the mechanism.
I'm afaid that you need to recognise your own idiocy level, rather than making your idocy patent by making unjustified claims about other people's performance.
Of course. When that is what happens. Some idiot the other day claimed one of the most commonly used chips in the world to be obsolete. That guy is foolish. Oh... that's right... YOU are that foolish idiot.
The difference being that I am not a fool, and my claim is factual.
The difference in the case of your claims is that you are a foolish, worn out, old, engineer wanna be that never had the competency required, an you do claim a great chip to be obsolete.
Essentially my remarks and claims about me are true, and my remarks and claims about you are true.
You cannot keep up with modern word usage. The term, in our modern world, you dumb turkey, is SKEPTICISM. You'll never make it out of the hole you dug for yourself, and you are still down there, digging it deeper.
That usage has been the norm and correct term for a long time now. Your term is archaic.
When your IQ is only 20, as in the case with you, perhaps.
Bwuahahahaha! Be afraid... be very afraid.
Your personality is the issue, and is blatantly apparent. That you missed that simple premise is yet another tell. It wasn't about performance, it is about the words you choose to lay down. The fact that you fail in both regards has no association between the two.
NONE of our programmers introduce typos into ANY of their thousands upon thousands of lines of code. We perform mission critical services. It is not surprising that you would be beneath understanding such industrial safety mechanisms as simple as hiring competent personnel.
Mr Nymbecile, you are a septic tank and a dullard to boot. You are therefore in no position to pass comment on spelling or the use of the English language in general.
There must be a shit fly in the room... no... Wait! The shit flies are here because what is in the room is a huge pile of shit named 'warm'n'flat.
Your mother should be in prison for the felony crime against society of not flushing the retarded piece of shit that you are, the moment she shat you out of the retarded piece of shit ass that she is. Your father should be drawn and quartered.
Put that in your spell checker and smoke it, you retarded little piece of shit.
It came out at around 140 when last tested, quite some time ago, which means that it is high enough that regular tests don't say anything more that that it is appreciably higher than average.
Since I can read and write and construct coherent sentences, it has to be a lot hgher than 20, as you'd be aware if you had any idea of what you were talking about.
I'm much more nervous about the idea that someone as ill-informed as you are has anything to do with performing "mission critical services".
at
Of course they do. But they check their code, and explain successive small lumps of it to other programmers (walk-throughs)in order to find and correct these typos.
The fact that you are unaware that this is going on tells us how willing you to pontificate on subjects where you are painfuly ill- informed.
Since I'm well aware how the problem is dealt with, and you - equally clearly - are not, the lack of understanding is entirely yours, clown.
Dimbulb thinks that "widely used" is incompatible with "obsolete". He's too dim to understand the idea of legacy parts and legacy design, which keep crappy old chips in production despite the fact that they could - and should - be replaced in every application by something newer, cheaper and better.
Unfortunately, redesigning a device and creating a new printed circut layout and production documents all cost money, so it ends up being more profitable to keep on churning out the same old rubbish.
If Dimbulb were an engineer he'd know about this, so he has to be a pointy-headed manager.
Except that you content here that a perfectly viable chip is obsolete, and your refusal to admit that you are wrong, shears a good 120 points off that number, guaranteed.
Also, we can tell that you are stupid. The chip argument just cements it in stone.
Great, yet sad indictment of your problem. You know nothing about the industry at all. Your "could be replaced in every application by something newer, cheaper and better" proves that fact.
Not that there is anything wrong with the original, but do you really think that all those chip fab and design boys are using the same art for these dies and chip designs that they were when the fab features were 50 times larger? You really are an idiot if that is the case.
You shot yourself in the head with the "all that costs money though..." remark. In more ways than one.
You prove that it is you that really does not understand the micro-electronic industry at all, much less the engineering behind analog and digital circuits.
How about if you head on over to the site mentioned --
formatting link
-- and suggest what parts you would use to make comparable designs? Note that on that web site he's essentially targeting a hobbyist market, so the designs have to be aimed at low volume production using easy-to-obtain components that aren't particularly spendy (but also don't have to have every penny turned around).
This could likely help a lot of people, being exposed to some "better than a
Typical Slowman double-talk. If it's "more profitable", it's LESS COST to stay with "legacy" parts.
Check out
formatting link
They continue to make some of my chip designs that were done in the early '60's!
Wonder why? It's PROFITABLE you dummy.
In the past year I've been approached to create modern versions of those of my old designs that are now unobtainium.
As for the 555 it's one of the cleverest designs ever... CMOS versions exist in the most modern of processes. Even my original MC4024 voltage-controlled multivibrator has been resurrected in modern CMOS.
You dummy! You dummy! You dummy! You dummy! You dummy! You dummy!
You're so ignorant that you don't realize how stupid you are. Why don't you do us all a favor and put a gun to your head and blow that puss-filled pimple away? I promise to come to your funeral and LAUGH ;-) ...Jim Thompson
--
| James E.Thompson, CTO | mens |
| Analog Innovations, Inc. | et |
| Analog/Mixed-Signal ASIC's and Discrete Systems | manus |
| Phoenix, Arizona 85048 Skype: Contacts Only | |
| Voice:(480)460-2350 Fax: Available upon request | Brass Rat |
| E-mail Icon at http://www.analog-innovations.com | 1962 |
I love to cook with wine. Sometimes I even put it in the food.
ElectronDepot website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here.
All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.