chemical
Did I say deterministic?
Non sequitur.
chemical
Did I say deterministic?
Non sequitur.
as
I have seen one of the new miniboxes (Scion?) with an "H5" sticker on the rear bumper.
Are you soothsaying again? Since you're a predictor of the future, what are tomorrow night's lottery numbers going to be? I guess I'll lighten up on that "Oh, so you're wiser than God?" stuff. ;-)
Admittedly, since we've got physical matter to deal with, and Loving Spirit won't override Free Will, it can be kind of a long ponderous process. It's kind of sad, really - by the time I demonstrate Eternal Life, everybody I know will be dead. )-;
Thanks, Rich
Only the ones you want to.
Cheers! Rich
I discovered once during an awesome acid trip, that the brain is essentially a connector. ;-P
Cheers! Rich
Nah. What you've been told is crap. You can know something is real when you _feel_ it. Just consciousness isn't enough - you have to accept your own sentientce.
Well, you don't _have_ to do anything - Free Will, after all, is Supreme.
But you do have the power to know truth.
Thanks! Rich
Ah, there's the rub. Just let there _be_ "alternate realities", and you're a long way towards healing. :-)
Good Luck! Rich
Yeah, Unhuh, Sure.
-- Service to my country? Been there, Done that, and I\'ve got my DD214 to prove it. Member of DAV #85. Michael A. Terrell Central Florida
Not specifically but that is usually the drift when someone suggests cognition is a "chemical process."
If that wasn't your intent then perhaps you could explain what significance you were trying to convey.
No and simply declaring you think so without specifying why is non productive.
In generic form what I said is simply, if one wishes to perform a task and tool A won't work then you need to seek an alternate tool.
Which, for the reason already mentioned, does nothing to foster communication.
And by what presumption do you assume I need 'healing'?
By the fact that _everybody_ needs healing, one way or another.
Cheers! Rich For more information, visit:
I don't think I'll ask how you came to know that 'fact'.
-- Aww..., why not? If he believes that _everyone_ needs healing and he\'s part of "everyone", then he\'s admitting that he\'s sick and needs healing too. What he hasn\'t owned up to (because he can\'t, if he\'s sick) is that being sick, he can\'t tell who\'s sick and who isn\'t. So, the game goes on...
Nice piece of logic. Reminds me a bit of Kirk convincing Nomad to self destruct because he was "flawed and imperfect."
-- So now, instead of the "objective" facade you\'ve been flaunting it\'s, "not specifically" and "that\'s usually the drift?" Got some stats?
Exactly. And once you learn to feel and accept that emotional charge, and learn its lesson, new understandings appear.
Good Luck! Rich
That's OK, I'll tell you anyway - by observation. :-)
Cheers!
Oh, but you see, I admitted my own sickness many moons ago, and have been healing apace; and actually, it's not necessary to discern who needs healing and who doesn't, because the whole Universe is in serious need of healing, and we are components of It. :-)
Cheers! Rich
-- Like if you piss me off and I kick you in the nuts and you accept that emotional charge and learn its lesson, you\'ll be less likely to piss me off in the future? Sounds good to me...
-- And your lenses are free from aberrations?
ElectronDepot website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.