Nope, sorry, not according to your government. They blame lifestyles and, curiously, implicate welfare:
~~~~~~~ "There are many factors that can affect a person's health: geography, socio-economic circumstances, health behaviours, and interactions among the three. ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Canadian communities with the lowest life expectancies are in the most northern and isolated parts of Canada, and are also characterized by low incomes and a high proportion of the population receiving government transfer payments. Smoking, heavy drinking and high mortality rates due to suicides and accidents are also prevalent in these health regions."[1] ~~~~~~~
So, lifestyles *do* explain the difference.
If healthcare is so vital to longevity, yet so unaffordable, consider the Amish in the USA: they have big families, little money, and pay for their own healthcare out of their own pockets. They have no healthcare plan at all, yet have exactly the same life expectancy as everyone else.[2]
But, then, those are just facts--don't let them influence you.
Best, James Arthur
[1]