Re: If this forum was human..

Yes I have seen all that,but it does not make him wrong just because someone disputes his statements.

And have you noticed that in the main the good discussions are with sensible people?

:)) Actually Rod and the F.Murf is closely related. I think F.Murf was pooped out by Rod. ;-)

It does make you wrong. 'cos you are poop came out of him. So, you do need to find your own answers in the cyberspace.

And you are not one of them. You're just Rod's poop still attached to his bum via a string. :-)

Are you on some sort of drug, as your posts are a bit incompressible?

Yep, he's always been a druggy.

Non-response duly noted.

Non-response duly noted.

Sigh! In the cases where he resorts to foot-stamping and insulting, he

In case you don't get it, with 'foot-stamping', I mean the foot-stamping of a three-year old. I.e. *all* he does, is say "You're wrong/stupid/!" without saying *why* the other party is wrong, and he does that because he *doesn't* have a counter-argument.

So I repeat: If you haven't seen that - unsubstantiated foot-stamping and insulting -, you haven't been here (aus.*) or had your eyes closed.

From your response, we can safely conclude the latter.

There are very, very few good discussions in the first place. But no, Roddles has no excuse whatsoever that the quality of the discussion mostly or even solely depends on the 'sensibility' of his correspondents. Quite the contrary, he has many, many of these fights with quite sensible people.

Bottom line: Roddles and Roddles alone is responsible for *his* actions.

My advice: Let this rest. You have no case, no case at all. If you want to help Roddles, then support him - if you think he's right - with actual factual arguments in an actual factual discussion.

You are just plain wrong, as always.

That happens when terminal f*****ts such as yourself desperately attempt to bullshit your way out of your predicament, as always.

Very difficult with no one able to come up with factual instances.

QED.

QED.

Pathetic, dishonest, 'convenient', silent snip duly noted.

QED.

You were given several - actually thousands - of examples. You chose to keep sticking your head in the sand. Your choice, not our problem.

But to add insult (literally) to injury, Roddles was kind enough to give a demonstration in this very thread.

QED.

HTH, HAND, EOD, NC.

What a stunning line in rational argument you have there, troll.

This wouldn?t be you doing precisely what you howl about, eh hypocrite ?

I think you're on backyard booze, 'cos you're talking about compressing my posts. Read this,

Start buying your booze, the walk to the supermarket and walk back home is good for you, and prevents you from overdoing it. You will also be helping the governement and those hardworking, poor booze companies.

You'll be next, man! Quit those illegal backyard activities immediately!

Very well said.

The Boozemeister hasth approached the arena to defend thyself.

Hey, I didn't do it!