Someone already suggested model airplane motors such as those by Turnigy = on=20 the
formatting link
website. Otherwise 400Hz motors as used on = aircraft=20 may be small enough at that power level, although most of them are not = long=20 and slim. If you can accept about 5 inches square, here is a 7.5 HP = motor=20 that is 5.5" square and 8" long, and 14 lb. 12,000 RPM.
formatting link
Here is a 1.75 HP 3phase 400Hz motor that is size 30, whatever that is. = But=20 they seem pretty small and I think they do custom:
formatting link
r/30-20-156? And 1.85 HP 22,000 RPM size 33.
formatting link
r/33-20-150?
This is almost 2HP but I see that size 33 is 3.28" dia:
formatting link
1.35HP is 2.6" diameter and 3.87" long. That's about 1 kW. Maybe five=20 mounted lengthwise on a common shaft?
and if power is needed (assuming the 8mm axel can handle it) it should posible to stack them on a common shaft. I believe the shaft is just a plain 8mm with a groove for a retainer ring and maybe a flat spot for a pinol screw
That's the common 'tape recorder' method. I would expect an ME to think of that and rule it out for gnashing the gears or just for being too 'tape recorder'.
--
Reply in group, but if emailing add one more
zero, and remove the last word.
28000 rpm! It's funny that the OP did not specify rpm, it seems to me that it would be a fundamental criterion. Voltage, current, cost could be dealt with, rpm not so much. Wonder if he is trolling.
The input shaft drove a 1:1 engaged gear pair, which gave me two parallel, counter-rotating shafts. They were coupled through one-way couplings (the shaft couplings with rollers inside) to two gears coupled with toothed belts, one of them driving the counter. The one-way couplers are very precise, practically ideal diodes, and only contribute error on reversal. Reversal in a steamship is infrequent, so the longterm loss was minute, probably not one shaft revolution per year. Try to design an electrical FWB rectifier that's accurate to better than 0.1 PPM!
Back-driving this rig is interesting. It behaves a lot like an electrical full-wave bridge rectifier.
--
John Larkin Highland Technology Inc
www.highlandtechnology.com jlarkin at highlandtechnology dot com
Precision electronic instrumentation
Picosecond-resolution Digital Delay and Pulse generators
Custom timing and laser controllers
Photonics and fiberoptic TTL data links
VME analog, thermocouple, LVDT, synchro, tachometer
Multichannel arbitrary waveform generators
A bridge made with 1N4148 diodes would have leakage of a few nA maybe and could conduct a few hundred mA, so from a current basis, that's more like 0.01ppm. Electrical wins again.
Forward drop is the analogous error, not reverse leakage. I think.
--
John Larkin Highland Technology, Inc
jlarkin at highlandtechnology dot com
http://www.highlandtechnology.com
Precision electronic instrumentation
Picosecond-resolution Digital Delay and Pulse generators
Custom laser drivers and controllers
Photonics and fiberoptic TTL data links
VME thermocouple, LVDT, synchro acquisition and simulation
I had a 6-hour layover in Honolulu so I took a taxi to Pearl Harbor - well worth the trip, a very moving experience - and toured a WWII submarine. It has a gorgeous torpedo targeting computer, full of gears and mechanical integrators and stuff. It's got a glass cover, looks sort of like a pinball machine.
--
John Larkin Highland Technology, Inc
jlarkin at highlandtechnology dot com
http://www.highlandtechnology.com
Precision electronic instrumentation
Picosecond-resolution Digital Delay and Pulse generators
Custom laser drivers and controllers
Photonics and fiberoptic TTL data links
VME thermocouple, LVDT, synchro acquisition and simulation
I've talked to the crew of the Nautilus who told of the equipment problems they had going under the North Pole. I also talked with the man who designed the controls for the reactor of that first nuclear powered submarine. There are a lot of old submariners living around here.
ElectronDepot website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here.
All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.