Merci pour cet aveu d'impuissance tellement révélateur.
Quant on est a cours d'arguments, accuser l'interlocuteur de faire partie d'une secte et de mener croisade
Il ne s'agit pas de religion, mais de science. La question est : Les rayonnement E.M. qui nous entourent ont-ils des effets biologiques, si oui ces effets ont-ils une influence néfaste sur la santé des *populations*; Les réponses étant fournies chacun agira selon sa motivation, quoique cela puisse être un problème de santé publique à gérer par les gouvernements. Je remarque qu'à aucun moment vous n'avez apporté un seul élément de réponse, à part nous assèner vos certitudes condescendantes.
C'est vous qui repartez la queue entre les jambes. J'oubliais... le pedigree de l'auteur cité:
Andrew Goldsworthy, Lecturer in Biology (retired), Imperial College London.
Andrew Goldsworthy was born in 1939 and obtained his BSc and PhD in the University
of Wales. He spent most of his career lecturing and researching in Plant Science at
Imperial College London. Topics covered included the biochemistry of photorespiration,
factors driving the evolution of chlorophyll, the electrophysiology of plants and the
biological effects of electromagnetically conditioned water. He gained a reputation
among students for explaining complex matters in a way that was easy to understand
and was later given a Rector's Award for Excellence in Teaching. Following his
retirement in 2004, he spent much of his time in library-work followed by a series of
Internet publications aimed at explaining to the lay-person the mechanisms by which we
are all affected by weak electromagnetic fields (see
links within). He is currently working on a mechanism that explains why the radiation
from relatively distant cell towers appears to be just as damaging as that from
cellphones applied to the ear.
Le vôtre c'est ?