Do you have a question? Post it now! No Registration Necessary
Subject
- Posted on
Linux and ARM7
- 02-22-2006

Re: Linux and ARM7
Op Wed, 22 Feb 2006 02:20:45 +0100 schreef snipped-for-privacy@hotmail.com

It depends. If the device can hurt, mistreat or kill the patient, then
no. If you want an RTOS, then no. Otherwise, it basically depends on
requirements of graphics, I/O, response time and memory.

It depends. If the device can hurt, mistreat or kill the patient, then
no. If you want an RTOS, then no. Otherwise, it basically depends on
requirements of graphics, I/O, response time and memory.
--
Gemaakt met Opera's revolutionaire e-mailprogramma:
http://www.opera.com/mail /
Gemaakt met Opera's revolutionaire e-mailprogramma:
http://www.opera.com/mail /

Re: Linux and ARM7

Linux is not realtime and thus it's timing behavior is not 100 %
predictable. Moreover Linux is huge and thus there might be weakly
tested spots. So critical stuff might better be done in another
environment (Not Windows, of course, as this is even less predictable.)
You might want to take a look at stuff like "PIKE OS" (e.g.
www.sysgo.com). This is a small real time OS that is commercially
supported and certified and works together with Linux. So you can do the
non-critical stuff (GUI, Network etc) in Linux. (I never used it so
don't ask...)
-Michael
Site Timeline
- » What to use for RT tasks
- — Next thread in » Embedded Linux
-
- » NETDEV_DOWN event nitification?
- — Previous thread in » Embedded Linux
-
- » Crosscompiling for ARM: reloc type R_ARM_ABS32 is not supported for PIC - ...
- — Newest thread in » Embedded Linux
-
- » Processor choice
- — The site's Newest Thread. Posted in » Electronics Design
-
- » Low Noise Direct Coupled Preamp
- — The site's Last Updated Thread. Posted in » Electronics Design
-