Yes I know. Under the heading of Scientists & Thinkers, I expected the people who were advancing science and engineering, not the authors on the best selling non-fiction list.
Paul C.
- Vote on answer
- posted
19 years ago
TIME's Top Scientists and Thinkers
Loading thread data ...
- Vote on answer
- posted
19 years ago
And this wasn't for a job interview?
It just looks like one more "Important-Sounding List" meant to generate a little more interest (as in subscriptions and hits on their website) in _TIME_, much like CNN's recent list of the greatest technical acomplishments (or whatever it was called) of the 20th Century.
I'm just grateful that Mr. "A New Kind of Scientist" didn't make the list. From what I've seen he's already a bit too proud of himself.
-----
formatting link
- Vote on answer
- posted
19 years ago
Too bad you live in The Arid Zone - I've heard that they work great in woodstoves.
Cheers! Rich
- Vote on answer
- posted
19 years ago
And this wasn't for a job interview?
It just looks like one more "Important-Sounding List" meant to generate a little more interest (as in subscriptions and hits on their website) in _TIME_, much like CNN's recent list of the greatest technical acomplishments (or whatever it was called) of the 20th Century.
I'm just grateful that Mr. "A New Kind of Scientist" didn't make the list. From what I've seen he's already a bit too proud of himself.
-----
formatting link
- Vote on answer
- posted
19 years ago
And this wasn't for a job interview?
It just looks like one more "Important-Sounding List" meant to generate a little more interest (as in subscriptions and hits on their website) in _TIME_, much like CNN's recent list of the greatest technical acomplishments (or whatever it was called) of the 20th Century.
I'm just grateful that Mr. "A New Kind of Scientist" didn't make the list. From what I've seen he's already a bit too proud of himself.
-----
formatting link