of
lds
nt
gst
ming.
to
ls.
pent
why
who
Maybe
It was purely in reponse to krw's post. I didn't make the connection between Alabama and the Univeristy of Alabama at Huntsville until I needed a club to beat krw over the head with.
I've read the e-mails, and Fred Pearce's book about the affair - "The Climate Files"
which - sadly - shows up the fact that Fred Peearce isn't scientifically trained and doesn't appreciate the extent to which scientists are trained to protect the integrity of the peer-reviewed literature, and is consequently critical of the - entirely justified - vigour of their response when it was contaminated by pseudo-scientific crap. It still makes it perfectly clear that the scientists involved weren't falsifying their results, or doing anything improper, though they certainly didn't like being persecuted by frivolous and malicious "freedom of information" demands from denialsts trawling for yet more propaganda-fodder.
My copy of the book is back in Nijmegen, so I can't give you chapter and verse.
they are Baptists - perhaps not
till
.l as
Absolutely. But you aren't allowed to lie about yours results or be dilatory in collecting them just because they might lead to - say - a better alternative to dilation and curretage.
which does seem to be roughly equivalent to what Christy and Spencer did - or rather failed to do when they should have done.
-- Bill Sloman, Nijmegen