Sorta OT: Win 7 64

Dec 30, 2009 171 Replies

you think,

'cannot' be intercepted?

quantum crypto systems

formatting link

computers,

Well, I'm mainly thinking about the security of trade secrets uploaded to external servers. Google springs to mind. Most espionage is economic, and the NSA (for example) spends quite a bit of its time on that sort of stuff.

Dirk http://www.transcendence.me.uk/ - Transcendence UK http://www.theconsensus.org/ - A UK political party http://www.blogtalkradio.com/onetribe - Occult Talk Show

a

The problem being that you also need a perfect pad. ;-) Of course it's almost always easier to attack a cryptosystem somewhere other than the encryption itself.

you think,

'cannot' be intercepted?

quantum crypto systems

formatting link

computers,

I suppose if they have to keep themselves busy somehow, stealing economic secrets would do it.

Best regards, Spehro Pefhany

"it's the network..." "The Journey is the reward" speff@interlog.com Info for manufacturers: http://www.trexon.com Embedded software/hardware/analog Info for designers: http://www.speff.com

No, I just hate anti MS retards that spew horseshit based on their peer clic's attitudes. That is about as immature as an adult can get.

On a sunny day (Thu, 31 Dec 2009 19:03:45 +0000) it happened Dirk Bruere at NeoPax wrote in :

you think,

'cannot' be intercepted?

quantum crypto systems

formatting link

computers,

Yes NSA works for US corporate. And UK follows US requests.. so if they really want the key... The other thing with your method is that if you use the same key more then once, then you are screwed too. Think about iot.

On a sunny day (Thu, 31 Dec 2009 10:51:03 -0800) it happened John Larkin wrote in :

See my replies to Dirk, to 'do it right' is very very difficult, and it still only can be used *once*, that is why it is called one time pad. I know of one case where the xor was used and it was broken before it even came out. LOL

Hey! Sounds like you might have a bit on the ball. That is totally different than the usual crop of retards that pass through.

My post was about signed drivers, and included a comment about retarded MS haters. I do not think that includes you, but hey, asswipe, if the shoe fits...

My remarks were not BS, you retarded POS. Otherwise your response would not have been in the same vein. My remarks about the retarded MS haters was, and still is, right on the mark.

Whatever, you retarded little piece of s*it.

Only total retards filter their news. I guess that you are one such retard.

You're an idiot.

I see idiots making this retarded declaration ALL the time.

All you are doing is mimicking what some other total retard mouthed. You do not actually know a goddamned thing about whether or not the claim is factual.

I can tell you... it is not.

generic

a

you think,

be intercepted?

quantum crypto systems

formatting link

The idiots out there that think it is not possible are uneducated or poorly educated or obsoletely educated idiots that do nothing but parrot what some other retard, or their retarded professor parroted one day. Both are wrong, and both are idiots, and both have obsolete educations.

Most, if not all of them, have no clue as to whether the claim is actually valid.

Not their military arm. That "law" does not apply.

Guess where it matters?

You are an idiot, and stop parroting the retarded net criminal's mantra, because it is not true, asshole.

Leave to the never contributory retard to make yet another non-contributory post.

I am glad I could help you become the total retard that you are K-Tard. These groups have obviously had an affect on you. That, or you were that way to begin with. How sad, you are.

I just run my old DOS apps in a Windows command-line box, the %SystemRoot%\system32\cmd.exe thing. Everything works fine, graphics and all, as long as the programs don't try to do direct port i/o.

Why use DOSBox?

John

generic

a

The software minded K-Tard idiot has no clue how the hardware world works.

Here is a real simple on for you, K-Tard.

IP encryptors have been in use for years. Go find one, and then find out their history, and the fact that they have NEVER been broken, and that they are the most attacked piece of hardware in existence.

So your claim is shot all to hell, like we all knew it would be. "cryptosystem" is not a word, K-Tard.

I do the same. But some that I rely on, e.g. Freelance 4.0, only run in full-screen mode, and full-screen went away with Vista. Is it back with Windows 7?

And apparently that doesn't work with 64-bit Win 7.

Cheers

Phil Hobbs

Dr Philip C D Hobbs Principal ElectroOptical Innovations 55 Orchard Rd Briarcliff Manor NY 10510 845-480-2058 hobbs at electrooptical dot net http://electrooptical.net

out.

Depends on what you XOR against. If it's a one-time pad, XOR is perfectly secure. In fact, that's how a one-time pad is used.

Just trying to explain your behavior, DimBulb.

AlwaysWrong is *always* so wrong. Poor baby. Time for mommy's hamper again, DimBulb.

Do you run Windows 7?

This thread is about a VDM, regardless of type, in a Windows 7 environment, which it appears, you are not familiar with.

Haven't you died of stupidity yet?

The only sensible decision that MS has ever made was hiring David Cutler to start to Windows NT family, which at least resembles a proper multitasking OS :-)

Join the Discussion

Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.

Didn't find your answer?

Ask the community — no account required