Lithium batteries, not worth it

and we think a 200 mile range in an Electric car is good :) 24 miles at approx 60mph with a pilot and a "load" of 23kg.

The miles per gallon figures are shown on the screen. 44mpg and from

But more CO2 is going to happen. China and India and Africa will see to that. They aren't going to stay poor for our convenience.

As a matter of fact... My brother said aeroplane but he was an aeronautical engineer Do you say Aerobus?

Where are you getting those numbers from and what fails ?

That's mad.

But it's still doable. And it shows it had a 77 litre tank. That's large. I've never had more than a 50 litre tank, except perhaps in a Range Rover. That only got 11mpg though.

Then he had more brains than you.

Surely an airnautical engineer? Mustn't confuse the poor little Americans.

That's a name of a manufacturer. They made a name they thought would sell. Probably thinking of the Merkin market.

Salt water batteries and Quantum batteries are far superior once they get into production. Lithium is nearing the end of it's life cycle.

For now I stick with lead acid for anything large. Lithium is for torches.

Depends on your needs. When we had two cars, if one had half that range it would be good. The other car could get by with it 11 months of the year.

Further, CO2 levels aren't well correlated with the projected mean global temperature when you're talking million year periods.

From mining claims, which make a public record of sites and estimated quantity. Since no one wants to bother to claim 'uneconomic' discoveries, they aren't a matter of public record until the price (and technology) to profit from 'em arrives. So, it's often gonna be the case that there's no registered source for twenty years from now, for almost any mineral.

It's a flawed statistic (when Pennsylvania was the US oil reserve, it was predictable that we'd be out of the stuff about a century ago) that is often trotted out to impress investors.

Not so. The refusal to debate is normal in science, only lawyers use the debate game to hone their skills. When looking for truth, debate is flawed: it encourages various sophistries that we know to be invalid arguments.

No its not. We do know that the world's climate was perfectly adequate for the animals and plants around at the time,

The most you can claim is that that scenario did support some much more massive animals than the current climate does.

In the Uk our Police helicopters carry high end Infra Red cameras on stabilised platforms.

You could dump the entire 93,628 square miles in eastern Montana and only the prairie dogs would notice.

The past tense is correct.

Thanks a lot for bringing Africans to North America.

To a point...