Best regards, Spehro Pefhany
Best regards, Spehro Pefhany
I'm sure that must be the case.
Graham
parents
bollocks.
fact.
parents
Congregational. But the church here is pretty joyless overall.
I look forward to the time when ppl aren't so foolish as to feel obliged to run their lives according to quaint superstitious old-fashioned beliefs about mystical 'supreme beings'.
Graham
bollocks.
means
fact.
See my later post in this regard.
Graham
Why do you have this perverse notion we need protecting from Jihadists?
Graham
supplies and
Meaning they don't actually feel very liberated? BTW, nicely placed snip there.
- YD.
Well, the way you fly off the handle whenever there's any criticism of the regime and its, erm, foreign policies does seem to be a hint.
Is the government all of America?
ISTR Roosevelt and Churchill teamed up with Stalin against Hitler. Later on R & C teamed up against S. All a matter of conveniences and priorities.
- YD.
Like all statistics it all depends on how you define the terms. I also question the $25k number. There is a lot of prison infrastructure that does not show up in their "per inmate" cost reported. Take the total "corrections" budget and divide it by the number of inmates and you get a much bigger number. School boards are also notorious for this kind of funding deception.
That grim attitude is typical of people who are dissatisfied with their lot in life.
Tough times over there?
Don
parents
I won't say that. Religion is a valuable part of a lot of people's lives. If it works for them, great. Just don't force the joy on people who don't share your brand of god.
parents
Islam will get you for that ;-)
...Jim Thompson
That's not a good costing. You need to look at the incremental cost - how much does it cost/save to add/remove one prisoner-year. You need to allow for the societal cost of releasing them - a burglar may cost society more free than in prison if he is still committing crimes and buying drugs.
But imprisoning bong sniffers is a calamitous waste of money.
...
"Eeyore" wrote in message news: snipped-for-privacy@REMOVETHIS.hotmail.com...
For a bunch of stinking, bug infested, half starving, homeless tribesmen wandering around in the shittiest place on earth 3,000 years ago, believing that you are "God's chosen people" may be a reasonable defence mechanism. For a bunch of fat Republicans in the 21st century in the USA it is grotesque and there is no foundation in fact. In fact history and the evidence would suggest that neither group has a firm grip on reality.
..
It's easier to grasp the lack of invisible men than the concept of an infinite universe. It also does less harm than believing in myths.
...
Once a political faction gets hold of the people, they need to keep that control.
This has been true for centuries.
People do not want to think that they have actual control of their lives or post life (i.e. death).
The political powers know this. And they will use that knowledge for their own power grabs.
So, do not tell the believers that they are believing in make-believe, they don't want to hear it.
So, we have people who want to believe in something and politics who want control of those people.
How can it get any easier.
donald
Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.
Ask the community — no account required