(the so
about US
the
Are you going to deny the existence of the Loyalists now ?
That's a truly s***ty site you referenced btw.
Graham
(the so
about US
the
Are you going to deny the existence of the Loyalists now ?
That's a truly s***ty site you referenced btw.
Graham
Also:
The prison industry makes a lot of money from it.
Some people want to make all bad things a crime.
In article , Eeyore wrote: [.....]
"a bit"! more like "seriously".
The Taliban is not completely discredited, has formed back up and is slowly beginning to control areas. The folks just inside the Pakistan border are sympathetic to the Taliban. Basically this is a festering wound on the country.
The president, Hamid Karzai, is still often derided as the "Mayor of Kabul because of how little actual control outside the capital he has. The central government is failing to gain authority and is leaving the tribes in charge.
There are poppy crops all over the place. This is a source of funding for the bad guys.
The US should not have aligned its self with the "northern alliance" and IMO should not have stated its goal to be to take control of the place. The issue was that they gave a safe haven to OBL. The US needed to punish them for that and perhaps encourage them to give him up. The US had a lot of bombs sitting around going rusty and B-52 pilots that needed the practice.
The person behind the "Homer J Simpson" subterfuge is a village idiot.
Posting from BC, CA, but claiming "we".
...Jim Thompson
In article , Jim Thompson wrote: [....]
Maybe tapeworms are a common problem in Canada.
(the so
about US
The
in the
the
The part where the Brittish troops were fighting? It is certainly true that everyone in the colonies was not on the side of Adams and Jefferson. Some liked being a colony and supported George. Perhaps you were using the American revolution as a proxy war with the French? That is actually pretty common in "civil wars", up to and including Vietnam. Super powers choose sides and have their war in somebody elses country. Holds down the damage back home.
I don't think we are intentionally "leaving stiuff broken" in Iraq. It is more of a case that we can't fix things as fast as they get blown up. It is pretty hard to fix something when you are constantly being shot at, every bag on the side of the road is a potential bomb and the work you do may be destroyed before morning. I have been ready for the US to declare victory and go home since
1991. THREE presidents and three of your Prime Ministers have rejected that idea.
You say Loyalist, we say trairor, funny how that works ;-)
I guess it was the only way to get people to move to Canada
The Soviets proved fighting in Afghanistan is a total waste of time and manpower. I am not sure why we even bothered. They will never become a western democracy. I know we don't like to talk about it but covert operations, identification and termination may be the only effective way to deal with terrorists. If they are not going to come out and line up in the field for battle conventional military force is useless, unless you just want to kill them all and let god sort them out.
Not when it's imitation cheese on a pizza.
Except the ones they like to do.
Effective would have been nice. A complete and utter fiasco hardly comes close to competent.
Yes. It's mean of people to criticize anyone for anything. Let's all live in fluffy cloud land and pretend it's all going to be all right. How did that work for the poor bastards who did as they were told and stayed in the WTC instead of getting out as best they could?
"Jim Thompson" wrote in message news: snipped-for-privacy@4ax.com...
There are more than a couple of people in BC.
A perfect example of being up to your ass in alligators.
Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.
Ask the community — no account required