message
there's so
your
paycheck!
it's
pros
insightful as
decision
or just
extant
going to
peers
example
with many
their
they
huge
stores
have?
does?
their
somethng, I
The board I'm drawing now (in pencil!) uses an Arria II GX-BGA572. Uses PCIe and tons of 1 GHz serdes stuff, great fun. My VHDL guys have had it with Xilinx. Great silicon, horrible tools.
John
D and MG respectively. See attachment: =20
begin 644 print.pdf M)5!$1BTQ+C0*)
I use Supernews and don't see your attachments.
John
Aha! MG would make sense as in Motor/Generator set.
They still make 'em?
don't
fake
Don't court radiation sickness, it's a very ugly way to go; just don't read its spew no more. ;-D
John, YOU are the hen here.
You got miffed when the roosters came out and cockled about your mistake, and YOU began clucking and have yet to cease.
You are WRONG, John. You also indicate to the ENTIRE world that you ignore standards and conventions at every turn. You even declared such.
That is pretty much the epitome of the definition of the word "pathetic", John.
You are uneducable.. Sadly, not because you are stupid, but because you choose to ignore the world for your "Larkin's Rose" colored view of things.
You could not be more incorrect. You are busted.
This is typical Larkin horseshit.
He goes from declaring that I have no math ability whatsoever, without a shred of evidence, to this dumbed down version of the same insult attempt.
All because the retarded bastard might have to admit that I was doing math before he knew what math was.
When did you get your first copy of the CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics?
Mine? 1972 at age 12. You lose... again.
The KEY word here is FOLLOW, idiot, not "cast aside at will according to artistic taste".
You get to follow whatever conventions the contractor declares in the quote you are going to produce product against.
You do NOT get to discount standards, or cast them aside as you see fit.
You are seriously lacking in ethics.
Nobody would buy your crap.
Engineers DESIGN. If you "draw", that is yet another part of YOUR problem.
A "drawing" of a girl on a park bench is drawing and you can do whatever you wish. A TECHNICAL document, on the other hand, has DECADES established ways and means to get from A to B.
For you to be so "math happy" and claim to know so much about electronics, yet discount CAD standards tells us that you really did not learn anything while you were in that place you claim was a school for electrical engineering.
It is quite a bit more absurd that you think it absurd.
You are like the retarded twit that never uses a goddamned turn signal. You epitomize the type of retard that needs his ass kicked. You are so bad, you could get your ass kicked daily, and even if the guy wrote what you did wrong down and pinned it to your chest, you still wouldn't get it.
I guess that settles it, John. The "Rat" has spoken. It must be so.
Since you are "busted", according to the "Rat", will you now turn yourself in to the "Faux Pas" police? I am sure that the sewer "Rat" will not give up until he drowns in his own excretions.
How about a demonstration of your math prowess, you lying piece of s*it?
Placing four way nodes on schematics?
Yes, I agree 100%, amateur.
Those that have made such a mistake usually get corrected by more experienced engineers, and they do not ever make the mistake again.
YOU, on the other hand, never had an engineer point out someone to you, without you turning into Mr. Stubborn, know-it-all, I'm better than you idiot.
The funny part is that you turned into that person a long time ago, and you got stuck that way.
Sad, truly so.
I'll bet that every toothless engineer in the world has more on the ball than you ever did or ever will, asshole Larkin.
The standard is that you NEVER make a node that way.
That is what removes ALL ambiguity, IDIOT! (directed at John, of course).
What credentials do you have that you are willing to share with the people here? John has presented his credentials by offering his company's Web site URL to show his accomplishments. Can you provide anything similar to that? I doubt it, but, if you can, then do so right now. Your vitriol is nothing compared to some evidence that you even work for a legitimate company. Post your company's URL, you spineless coward.
Poat one of your schematics so we can admire it.
John
Bullshit.
Says the little banty rooster who doesn't design ICs. You are almost as bad as Dimbulb when it comes to a steady stream of trash talk.
Sounds like you're joining their team. Enjoy.
John
Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.
Ask the community — no account required