OT: Canada Agrees to be Missile Target

You've been reading too much Chomsky. Stay away from those MIT types.

Best regards, Spehro Pefhany

I read in sci.electronics.design that Spehro Pefhany wrote (in ) about 'OT: Canada Agrees to be Missile Target', on Thu, 3 Mar 2005:

I think the same red tape applies here. Brussels, you know. You could send me an air ticket instead, but in fact I expect to be in Toronto at the beginning of June, so I can do my own testing.

I read in sci.electronics.design that John Larkin wrote (in ) about 'OT: Canada Agrees to be Missile Target', on Thu, 3 Mar

I have it on excellent authority that Eve was US Citizen, and she got us thrown out of Eden!

I read in sci.electronics.design that legg wrote (in ) about 'OT: Canada Agrees to be Missile Target', on Fri, 4 Mar 2005:

I hope it's an exact clone, so that it sets fire to the graphite moderator.

Lies! All lies! She was French!

John- if you have time available, perhaps we could get together. If I can be of any assistance, please ask.

Best regards, Spehro Pefhany

I read in sci.electronics.design that Spehro Pefhany wrote (in ) about 'OT: Canada Agrees to be Missile Target', on Fri, 4 Mar 2005:

Sounds interesting. The thing is, that I am scheduled to spend most of May outside UK at IEC meetings, so by June 1 I expect not to be human. You might have to feed me through the bars!

Chomsky is a hoot; he's listened to his own fatheaded twaddle for so long that he's grown exponentially loony. Somebody just did some experiments that prove that one of his pet linguistic theories (that language skill is a necessary portal to mathematics) is hogwash. What a Moore-On.

John

It would be a pleasure. ;-)

Best regards, Spehro Pefhany

Well, the cold war *is* over.

I think things are slowly getting better.

John

No, you're just incapable of staying on topic.

RL

Ah, yet another evil perpetrated by the American barbarians. I don't know how you sophisticates tolerate such outrages.

John

Oh those silly Canadians! For some reason they can't see the value in lavishing scores of billions of dollars on their military, in order to set up a system that's never been shown to work, to protect against a danger that doesn't exist.

Instead they spend money on their people, bringing them great services and a working health system.

Oh why can't they be more like us! (who are just as safe--there being no danger--AND have the precious freedom to be uninsured).

Leonard

True, it has not been shown to work. No no one has launched a missle at us, yet. Note that it's still in development. Yes, it's a hard problem. Impossible? Only an idiot would believe such.

Your guess. If it's wrong...

For small values of "working".

Of course they don't have to pony up. We'll protect Canuckistan, if only by accident.