Simulator error 607

Feb 06, 2008 1 Replies

Hi everyone,



I'm running Webpack ISE 9.2i (just updated to 9.2.04i/J40) on Suse10.1. This is not the 'blessed' RedHat but so far, this has worked great for compiling simple VHDL and putting it on a Spartan 3 kit.



I'd like to learn how to properly simulate my designs though, and I've tried to implement the 'Design Simulation' chapter from the ISE 9.2i Quickstart (which is actually the 9.1i quickstart):

formatting link
So I have created a counter.vhd, a testbench etc. all according to the manual. When I click 'check syntax' for the VHDL file, no errors or warnings are returned.



However, trying to actually simulate the design returns "Simulator error



Parsing "counter_beh.prj": 0.02 Building counter_isim_beh.exe ERROR:Simulator:607 - ISE Simulator is unable to elaborate this design due to specific coding constructs used in the design. Xilinx is actively working on reducing the number of conditions where this error occurs. For more information on this error, please consult Answer Record 24067 in Answers Database at

formatting link



I did of course look at the answer record in question, but none of the answers seem to apply to this case - one would assume that Xilinx's simple design isn't triggering such conditions anyway.



I've already googled a bit, and renamed the 'ld' commands in the Xilinx gcc subdirectories, but that didn't help. There are other Linux users with this same problem, but I've not found a solution so far.



Does anyone know how to get the simulation to work?



Otherwise - how can I run the simulation from the command-line so I can get a better idea of what it's trying to compile and where things are going wrong? One thing that I noticed is that it's apparently trying to create an .exe file, which wouldn't be suitable for a Linux platform.



Regards, Paul Boven.



P.S.: Yes, I'm aware that only RH is supported by Xilinx - but only Suse is supported by my employer :-)


Follow up: I've installed the same ISE9.2i on Ubuntu (Gutsy Gibbon) on my laptop, and here simulation does work as expected. But the laptop doesn't have a parallel port, so I'm still interested in getting everything working on just one system.

Regards, Paul Boven.

Join the Discussion

Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.

Didn't find your answer?

Ask the community — no account required