I just discovered one more reason not to trust Google blindly. I tried to locate a thread - somewhat older than a year - and Google proudly did not find it at all (it was my thread and I remembered enough keywords). Then I searched the web and found the thread allright archived at several other places, confirming I am not going insane after all.
So I found some sites, this one looked like perhaps usable:
Dimiter
Indeed it does.
Which is a marked regression, in my case, because my groups list is now many screens long.
The problem is both 1) the non-bugs - "enhancements" - forced on the entire user base; 2) the bugs that may or may not be fixed (see also: McSoft).
And then, having done that, why shouldn't we get pissed off when nothing changes?
Google makes no guarantee to listen to anyone, which is fine, but don't expect people to not complain about regressions. Not complaining would be worse (see also: McSoft).
some time.
it one way or the other, yet.
Yep: hit this one all the time.
Don't hold your breath.
"Rent"? Your local public library will lend a translation for free.
...agreed. The first thing I did was switch to "lightweight" HTML so I could have serif'd Times back.
format)
Yep.
leaves
Except the one labelled "BETA" was very reliable, and they took the label OFF when they rolled out the one with serious bugs. Go figure.
capability:
So, what did you personally say, that Google didn't listen to? Is this tangible or theoretical?
Cheers, Brandon Van Every
ElectronDepot website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.