Unless the person is selling this thing who cares? I was under the impression someone could build something for personal use regardless of patents.
I certainly wouldn't let a patent stop my own innovation.
Just to let you guys know .. the reason people top post is because YOU guys are tooooo lazy to cut the length of quoted text down to under a page .. you bitch about following policy ... then choose WHICH policy you decide to follow ...
QUIT POSTING THE WHOLE ORIGINAL MESSAGE !!!!!!!!!!!
or ...
put up with top posting ...
some people dont want to have to scroll every msg down to the second page to read the response .. !!
snipped-for-privacy@bellatlantic.net (ehsjr) wrote in :
-- Then you were under the wrong impression.
-- LOL, you make up rules for us to follow and then you don\'t even follow them yourself? That is, you didn\'t even trim the stuff below, which has nothing to do with your post. Fuck you and the horse you rode in on, hypocrite.
Which reminds me, a few years ago i remember a case where a company create a product that some one else had a patent on. The product was for a very small and specific market. The person that held the patent for this, heard about it after 2 years of it being used then the legal battle started. In the end. the patent holder didn't get anything other than a large bill from his lawyer. It appears that this person had patents on a lot of different things with no actual material(devices, paper work, documentation ect) etc.. In other words, they simply created patents on idea's only. It was there for decided in court that the patent was invalid, and soon after, the company got a patent for them self's on this product.
I remember a few years ago when i was in a small business of my own, I was told to package a sample of the product we had and mail it to my self but never open it. Do this once a year. and also get a legal patent on record. Because cases like this happen all the time.
-- "I\'m never wrong, once i thought i was, but was mistaken" Real Programmers Do things like this. http://webpages.charter.net/jamie_5
Bad advice. Write it up, get someone with understanding to read it and date and sign the report.
-- .
oh dear!
you just don't learn do you?
having got publicly slaughtered in the little trot about PINs and card security in general (oh yes you f****ng were), you are up to your tricks again... spouting about things you have no knowledge of, making threats then denying them, ripping into people when they don't agree with you.
hey... I am still waiting for you to do your hocus-pocus thingy on my heart - oh wait! you can't - COZ IT'S ALL CRAP!
here... I had an idea... take a look at this link....
this is a scan of my birth certificate - I have blurred out all the interesting stuff... you will also notice that I am certified male - your certificate (if you had one - what with you being a little bastard and all) would say "androgynon" - greek for "man-girl" i.e. you are a weener with no balls... fits.
You reckon it would be a bad thing for a psycho - err, psychic to stop my heart so you won't do it out of loyalty to some higher power... well this is fairly benign and you won't get into trouble with any sky-fairies...
here is my challenge to you - once again, MY FAITH AGAINST YOURS- I have faith you will fail.
remote view my birth certificate and give me two of the missing details... just two... there's a reason I ask for two - lets see how smart you are eh? If RV is all it is supposed to be, then you should be able to give all the details... but like all other RVs you won't - BECAUSE IT DOESN'T WORK! Oh, and your reference to some film I should see that deal with RV... IT'S ONLY PEOPLE PRETENDING! IT'S NOT REAL - are you one of these idiots that cheers ina movie when superman fixes the bad guy... bet you are... whooping and punching the air - remember the 80%? That's you that is.
you won't be able to resolve the data from the image - gaussian blur leaves no residual that can be rebuilt.
I await your failure with baited breath.
A non-correct reply or abscence of a reply within one week is an admission by you of complete failure - you must be used to this by now.
PS... you suck gay c*ck.
good point well made.
I think TP is a better format but not wishing to annoy, I bend to others preference.
-- Bad advice on top of bad advice, dumbfuck. Read this: http://www.uspto.gov/web/offices/pac/disdo.html
To prosecute people who tamper with the CATV physical plant, which was happening LONG before there was any scrambling equipment. I've seen photos were some dumbass hacksawed the shield off the .750" CATV trunkline. Then he connected it directly to his TV set. The high RF levels blew out the RF amp, and the 30 VAC 30 A power supply set the input circuit on fire. Most of the system went down when he opened the shield, so it wasn't very long before the damage was found. Then, the stupid SOB tried to sue the CATV company for the damage to his TV, and not having warning labels that the lines were carrying AC power.
-- Service to my country? Been there, Done that, and I\'ve got my DD214 to prove it. Member of DAV #85. Michael A. Terrell Central Florida
Plonk!
-- Service to my country? Been there, Done that, and I\'ve got my DD214 to prove it. Member of DAV #85. Michael A. Terrell Central Florida
and a small submarine to go with it.
I did that to a neighbor's TV once... lit it off with a KW pumped into a 50' long V-beam on 2-meters ;-)
...Jim Thompson
--
| James E.Thompson, P.E. | mens |
| Analog Innovations, Inc. | et |
| Analog/Mixed-Signal ASIC\'s and Discrete Systems | manus |
| Phoenix, Arizona Voice:(480)460-2350 | |
| E-mail Address at Website Fax:(480)460-2142 | Brass Rat |
| http://www.analog-innovations.com | 1962 |
America: Land of the Free, Because of the Brave
Thanks - but somehow your post must've gotten messed up. The helpful part seems to be missing.
Ed
So is it written in stone somewhere that contributors to this group have to post in some certain way??
Sorry; it is you that needs to do the checking.
snipped-for-privacy@verizon.net (Jack) wrote in :
you would think soooo .. the way these guys freak out when you top post.
btw .. John Fields, I didnt trim any of the message on purpose just to show you how absurd it looks ... asshole...
On Sun, 18 Mar 2007 17:41:28 GMT, Jonathan Kirwan Gave us:
Most thieves aren't.
The "many years ago" could be the problem ... things have changed in the last few years. Although I hate to use Wikipedia to support a point, the "Research exemption" page does have some good references to read about:
-- Michael Brown Add michael@ to emboss.co.nz - My inbox is always open
On Mon, 19 Mar 2007 06:51:28 +1200, "Roger Dewhurst" Gave us:
Place the mirror from a simple pair of bicyclist's glasses on his swimming goggles. Done!
ElectronDepot website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.