e
During Reagon years, Reagon removed funding for the arts. I battled him against that and lost. I thought govt should fund arts to make certain art was kept alive for our communities. Keep art available for people.
Yet, AFTER funding was removed, two things happened, 1. artists I had never heard of suddenly started appearing to show their wares and ask for money. and 2. art no longer took the form of blocks of glass piled up and sand poured around them, but actually became esthetically pleasing.
Thus, I came to the conclusion that I was wrong! Govt had no right to fund [and therefore distort] the artistic process. By NOT funding art, art became more available to the community *and* was better, being more responsive to the artistic tastes of the community. So without funding the community benefited twice.
Whole process was an eye opener for me. Made me wonder how many other funding issues I was wrong about.
The final conclusion is that govt should NEVER do long term solutions. Temporary funding for the arts injects, but will not distort. Temporary taxes will raise money, but long term taxes stop the taxed activity/business and revenues decline. Even funding projects for short period is good, long term is bad.
Therefore all our laws should have VERY firm expiration dates on them. And politicians even shorter expiration dates.