On Sun, 16 Aug 2015 16:22:55 -0700 (PDT), Bill Sloman Gave us:
Nice try, loser.
It gets used in NEW designs every day.
- Vote on answer
- posted
8 years ago
Time to Upgrade ?:-}
Loading thread data ...
- Vote on answer
- posted
8 years ago
On Sun, 16 Aug 2015 16:33:31 -0700 (PDT), Bill Sloman Gave us:
snipped further buncombe.
- Vote on answer
- posted
8 years ago
On Monday, 17 August 2015 09:46:18 UTC+10, DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno wrot e:
By "legacy" designers, who keep on implementing design solutions which work ed back in the 1970's and keep on working now. They aren't the cheapest or best solutions any more (if they ever were), but they still work. There are some designers who still design in 741 op amps too. I can't imagine who'd hire them.
-- Bill Sloman, Sydney
- Vote on answer
- posted
8 years ago
On Sun, 16 Aug 2015 18:00:00 -0700 (PDT), Bill Sloman Gave us:
Says Bill SlowBoy, legacy s.e.d. dumbfuck.
- Vote on answer
- posted
8 years ago
On Monday, 17 August 2015 12:06:58 UTC+10, DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno wrot e:
rote:
Not an honour I can aspire to. There's much too much competition for that p osition for me to be in contention. I imagine that it's only modesty that p revents you from putting yourself forward - Skybuck Flying may have a stron ger claim, but you definitely deserve it for being remarkably persistent an d assertive in your stupidity.
-- Bill Sloman, Sydney
- Vote on answer
- posted
8 years ago
You are the very definition of a troll.
- Vote on answer
- posted
8 years ago
-- If he got it wrong, then you must be lower pond-scum than DLUNO. John Fields
- Vote on answer
- posted
8 years ago
Whenever you see one of those long Sloman/Fields/AlwaysWrong sequences, just ignore the whole sorry mess. It's always the same geezer bickering.
- Vote on answer
- posted
8 years ago
Aww...
Poor baby wannabe Queen of USENET wants to be the only one to have any fun here.
John Fields
- Vote on answer
- posted
8 years ago
-- Indeed, but my simile was chosen to show that, reductio ad absurdum, what you maliciously chose to call a "wimpy load", wasn't, contextually. I think you missed that point since your rebuttal: "It can sink more current (and get hotter)if you can live with higher saturation voltages. There's a wide gap between that and any kind of "tank"", seems more like unwitting agreement rather than informed dissent.
- Vote on answer
- posted
8 years ago
On Mon, 17 Aug 2015 12:59:21 -0500, John Fields Gave us:
I think I am supposed to say thanks. I guess I am thinking pond scum, perhaps. At least I am working in the electronics industry in a design capacity. Though I don't know if that puts me higher on the totem poe or lower... and yes, I do know the real difference.
Donald Trump is rich and I guess he thinks that equates him with superheroes, because he called himself Batman.
I guess he'll shoot himself in the head, much less the foot soon enough. The idiot wants to do away with natural born birthright citizenship now too.
He's what I would call "dead in the water". Just like Sloman.
- Vote on answer
- posted
8 years ago
On Mon, 17 Aug 2015 12:07:48 -0700, John Larkin Gave us:
You're just a pissed off little bitch because accurate descriptions of you and your pathetic behavior get iterated often.
- Vote on answer
- posted
8 years ago
On Mon, 17 Aug 2015 16:47:08 -0500, John Fields Gave us:
+1Flawless. Plus one!
- Vote on answer
- posted
8 years ago
You're having fun?
- Vote on answer
- posted
8 years ago
Whatever.
Enjoy.
- Vote on answer
- posted
8 years ago
You are taking Jim Thompson too seriously. Nobody who posts here can be "pond scum" - not even AlwaysWrong - and trying to set up a single linear ranking system is equally silly.
Not that I can find any ranking system that puts DecandentLinuxUserNumeroUno far off the bottom of the pile - he doesn't make many typos, but that's pretty much all that can be said in his favour.
-- Bill Sloman, Sydney
- Vote on answer
- posted
8 years ago
Curious as I am about your cognitive defects, and how they lead you to make this defective claim, I doubt if the rest of the group needs your rationalisation. We already get a lot of nonsense to study, and more would be redundant.
-- Bill Sloman, Sydney
- Vote on answer
- posted
8 years ago
It appears you already have a 64 bit system (AMD Athlon 64). It's the 32 bit (and 16 bit?) backwards compatibility you have to worry about. And that's as much a problem of the O/S no longer supporting it as most x86 compatible h/w.
-- Paul Hovnanian mailto:Paul@Hovnanian.com ------------------------------------------------------------------ The more corrupt the state, the more numerous the laws. " - Tacitus
- Vote on answer
- posted
8 years ago
On Mon, 17 Aug 2015 20:46:46 -0700, "Paul Hovnanian P.E." Gave us:
That went over his head. He didn't even know what he was running on or even what is running on it.
- Vote on answer
- posted
8 years ago
-- No offense intended, I was just commenting on the BS from BS.