THE THRUTH ABOUT EVOLUTION AND THE CORONA VIRUS (2023 Update)

I WANT YOU THINK ABOUT TWO SCENERIOS/CASES:

TWO SCENERIOS:

  1. SEVEN BILLION PEOPLE ARE ALL IN ONE ROOM AND 1 PATIENT ZERO COUGHTS THEM ALL IN THE FACE.

  1. SEVEN BILLION PEOPLE ARE ALL IN A SEPERATE ROOM AND THEY PASS ALONG THE VIRUS FROM PERSON TO PERSON.

WHICH CASE DO YOU THINK IS BETTER ? TAKE YOUR TIME...

MY COMPUTER SIMULATION OF COREWARS ANSWERS THIS QUESTION.

CASE 1 IS BEST CASE SCENERIO BECAUSE:

THE VIRUS IS STILL WEAK, AND ALL PEOPLE FIGHT THE SAME VIRUS WITH THEIR IMMUNE SYSTEM AND THEN THE PANDEMIC IS OVER.

CASE 2 IS WORST CASE SCENERIO BECAUSE:

THE VIRUS CAN THEN MUTATE FROM PERSON TO PERSON AND ACQUIRE PERHAPS NEW TRICKS AND NEW DNA.

SO THE SECOND CASE IS LIKE A CHAIN OF PEOPLE

A->B->C->D->E->F

NOW IN REALITY THIS CHAIN OFCOURSE WOULDN'T WORK IF B STOPS THE VIRUS AND STAYS IN DOORS, THEN THE CHAIN IS BROKEN.

THIS IS WHERE THE VIRUS BENEFITS FROM A TREE APPROACH

0->1->3 0->1->4 0->2 ->5 0->2->6

SO PATIENT ZERO INFECTS TWO PATIENTS; 1 AND 2.

AND PATIENT 1 AND 2 INFECT PATIENTS 3,4 AND 5,6.

THIS IS EXPOTENTIAL GROWTH.

THIS INSURES THAT IF PATIENT 3 FOR EXAMPLE STOPS THE VIRUS, PATIENT 4 MIGHT PASS IT ON.

SAME WITH 5 AND 6.

SO THIS TREE LIKE SPREADING OF THE VIRUS IS POTENTIALLY VERY DANGEROUS, THIS I NEVER REALLY MODELLED I DIDN'T GET TO THAT STAGE, I DID MODEL IT WITH A TREE OF 10 BRANCHES BUT THAT TAKES A LOT OF COMPUTATIONAL TIME.

I WANTED TO TEST THIS "ISOLATED" APPROACH BUT NEVER COMPLETED IT. (8 VIRUSES PER BRANCH IN THEIR OWN HABITAT)

I SUSPECT BY KEEPING THE VIRUS IN CLUSTERS IT'S ACTUALLY MORE DANGEROUS BECAUSE IT ALLOWS WEAKER VARIANTS OF THE VIRUS TO KEEP MUTATING AND EVOLVING INSTEAD OF BEING REPLACED BY ANOTHER.

MORE VARIANTS/MUTATIONS IS SIMPLY MORE DANGEROUS.

SO NOW LOOKING BACK AT HOW THE CRISIS WAS DEALT WITH WE ON PLANET EARTH MIGHT HAVE DONE THE WRONG THING BY ISOLATING PEOPLE AND TRYING LOCKS DOWNS, IT HELPS HOSPITALS KEEP NUMBERS DOWN, BUT IT IS AIDING THE VIRUS BY GIVING IT TIME TO MORE SLOW SPREAD FROM PERSON TO PERSON AND BASICALLY LEARN/ADEPT TO EACH INDIVIDUAL'S IMMUNE SYSTEM.

NOW THE VIRUS IS ALSO BEING CONFRONTED WITH CORONA VACCINES AND IT MAY ADEPT, THE MORE CHALLENGERS/COMPETITORS/ANTI-DOTES IT SEES THE STRONGER IT WILL BECOME.

FINALLY A WORD OF CAUTION:

SUMMER IS NOW SLOWLY BECOMING REALITY IN EUROPE, THIS MAY BE THE REAL CAUSE OF THE INFECTION NUMBERS GOING DOWN, OTHER CAUSES MIGHT BE MANIPULATION OF NUMBERS OR MANIPULATION TESTS THRESHOLDS OR LESS TESTS BEING PERFORMED.

IT IS POSSIBLE THAT NEXT WINTER THIS VIRUS WILL RETURN, STRONGER THAN EVER BEFORE AND CREATE MORE INFECTIONS AND MORE DEATHS.

THIS CRISIS MIGHT NOT YET BE OVER.

BYE, SKYBUCK.

Reply to
skybuck2000
Loading thread data ...

The solution was not to release the virus in the first place, or at least isolate it early. We need a non-political health organization to take charge in the beginning, WHICH is not the WHO.

Reply to
Ed Lee
<snipped Skybuck being just as dumb as ever>

You've got to recognise that you've got a problem in order to do that. The Chinese were reluctant to accept that they were dealing with an epidemic early on, and slow to recognsie that it was spreading by person-to-person transmission.

Sadly, recognising that you are dealing with a pandemic is a political decision, and any organisation tasked with doing that is stuck with an intensely political job.

W.H.O. did as well with the information they were given as they could have beeen expected to do - the initial problems were all driven by China' internal politics.

Ed Lee is strangely reluctant to recognise that once China did recognise that it had an epidemic to cope with, it did take effective action.

formatting link
puts it's deaths per million population at 3 which is remarkably good. Ed Lee finds it implausibly good.

The US had plenty of warning and performed as badly as the worst managed countries around the world. A number of countries have done quite a bit better than the US. Taiwan has now dropped back to being no better than China claims to be. Australia is a factor ten worse, but a factor of fifty better than places like the US.

Reply to
Bill Sloman

You would save your self a lot of time and anxiety if you acquired some education. SARS-CoV-2 is undergoing what's called convergent evolution, becoming less, not more, of threat in time.

formatting link

Reply to
Fred Bloggs

skybuck2000 snipped-for-privacy@hotmail.com wrote in news:e0776747-bb16-4e07- snipped-for-privacy@googlegroups.com:

I want you to STOP posting your off topic horseshit to our group, youpathetic putz!

You are so f****ng stupid you can't even post without all caps.

Damn you are stupid, little boy.

Reply to
DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno

Ed Lee snipped-for-privacy@gmail.com wrote in news:d87eda7f-f171-4adf- snipped-for-privacy@googlegroups.com:

You are almost as stupid as the all caps retarded off topic posting dumbfuck you responded to.

Reply to
DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno

Bill Sloman snipped-for-privacy@ieee.org wrote in news: snipped-for-privacy@googlegroups.com:

Absolutely true.

I am pretty sure that Ed Lee is a retarded Trumper, so is bent brained from the get-go.

Reply to
DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno

Your elected President Biden also want to know if the virus was made and release from the lab.

Reply to
Ed Lee

What we are asking is not to simply dismiss it. The (WHO) conclusion that it came from nature has no creditable fact to support it either. Many medical scientists found it hard to follow their logics or your so called non-facts. We are just following the evidences that it happened a few miles from a military bio lab and several staffs from the lab got sick from it, long before the reported cases from the sea food market.

Reply to
Ed Lee

ElectronDepot website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.