The Dims want to jam EVs down our collective throats

Aug 03, 2023 Last reply: 2 years ago 9 Replies

formatting link
Passenger cars would have to achieve 66.4 miles a gallon in 2032, up from 44.1 mpg last year. The ramp-up for trucks and SUVs is even steeper—to 54.4 mpg from 32.1 mpg. Auto makers will have no way to comply but to make more EVs.



Here’s the kicker: The Energy Department is also proposing to reduce the “miles per gallon equivalent” for EVs. For example, the F-150 Lightning’s rating would decline to 67 mpg from 237 mpg. This means auto makers will have to produce even more EVs to meet Cafe mandates. They’ll be fined if they fall short.



A GM presentation to the White House estimated that industry penalties could total $300 billion, or about $4,300 per vehicle, from 2027 to 2031. Consumers and workers will pay the cost, and for what? The Administration claims the proposal will reduce CO2 emissions through 2050 by 885 million metric tons—about half as much as Canada’s wildfires are projected to release this year.


Sewage Sweeper hasn't noticed that shippers who have put in adequate fire-control system are insured to ship electric vehicles by boat.

His capacity to read stuff in ways that suit his point of view is well known. His capacity to realise that he has got stuff wrong is zero. He gets read because jeering at his mistakes is easy and fun. And it isn't even unkind - he just sees himself as heroic defender of what he imagines to be the truth.

It only looks that way if you are as silly as Fred. We might manage a population crash, but the survivors should be able to sustain communications and hang onto most of our data. We might need to purge everything ever published by the Murdoch media, but it could be argued that we won't rate a modern civilisation until we get around to doing that. It is a residual barabarism.

It says we should think about what might do it - it isn't any kind of prediction.

Join the Discussion

Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.

Didn't find your answer?

Ask the community — no account required