I use metric frequently in my work, but apparently metric fasteners are still a few cents more expensive than standard over here, so there's still economic pressure, however slight, to continue using them.
Metric is kind of nice because you can "make your own" when it comes to magic sizes and stuff. Sometimes you want, say, a plate that's 1/4 or
3/8" thick, but it just doesn't look quite right -- visually appealing. Instead, you could specify 5, 7.5, 10, etc. mm thickness, or other odd values, assuming it's in stock of course -- and potentially get more elegant proportions and whatnot. This is analogous to working in conventional vs. Exx series R/L/C component values: some ratios are easy to get (factor of 2 = 1k:2k vs. 1k:2.2k off by 10%), others not so much. On further analysis, one would probably find it's a wash, in the end.
Insert usual blurb about the inch technically being metric (i.e., so effing what, specify 6.35mm bolts instead).
Tim
Deep Friar: a very philosophical monk.
Website: http://seventransistorlabs.com
"cameo" wrote in message
news:kfn0hs$hg1$1@dont-email.me...
>I seem to remember that a few dacades ago (maybe in the '70s) there was
>some kind of federal push to convert the country to the metric system by
>a certain date that is already in the past. As it's painfully obvious by
>now, not much came out of that initial excitement.
>
> Why do you think it is that the US public so resistant to such a change
> when the metric system is so much simpler? Much of the rest of the
> industrialized world is already on the metric system and not following
> their lead just impedes international commerce.