Am 28.02.2023 um 14:41 schrieb Max Sailor:
Versuche es einmal mit einem 100 uF/16V Elektrolytkondensator mit + an der Basis von Q1 und an Masse.-
Aber warte 'mal ab, was die anderen Leute hier schreiben ...
Grüße
Am 28.02.2023 um 14:41 schrieb Max Sailor:
Versuche es einmal mit einem 100 uF/16V Elektrolytkondensator mit + an der Basis von Q1 und an Masse.-
Aber warte 'mal ab, was die anderen Leute hier schreiben ...
Grüße
Google translate givers
It uses two halves of an LM358. the first as a gain-of-two amplifier, the second as comparator. It's not an elegant circuit.
Nothing comes to mind immediately. A big capacitor - 100uF electrolytic from the base of Q1 to ground might slow it down enough to kill the initial spike.
R9 is 10k so 100uF is a 1sec time constant. The capacitor will never see more than 0.6V, so it doesn't need much of a voltage rating - 6.3V would be an overkill, but Farnell lists 537 of them, so you'd have a lot of choice,
Try a 100uF/16V electrolytic capacitor with + on the base of Q1 and to ground.-
But wait and see what other people write here...
Drat. I didn't see that before I posted my own suggestion. 16V is an even more popular rating, but the capacitor will be bulkier.
After I'd slept on the problem, I realised that C2 on the circuit diagram is creating the problem. When power is first switched on, C2 initially holds the threshold low - at the ground voltage. If C2 was hooked between the threshold voltage and Vcc, the threshold voltage would start high and decline to the target value.
No trigger at turn-on.
<snip>
Einface C2 entfernen.
piglet
ElectronDepot website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.