> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > GnatTurd snipped-for-privacy@yahoo.com wrote in
> > > > > > > news: snipped-for-privacy@googlegroups.com:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> GnatTurd snipped-for-privacy@yahoo.com wrote in
> > > > > > > >> news: snipped-for-privacy@googlegroups.com:
> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > >> >> >formatting link
> > > > > > > >> >> > -hu rricane-season-quietest-start-in-30-years
> > > > > > > >> >> Why do you ask 'where are the storms'? Upstream from the
> > > > > > > >> >> floods, is the usual place to look. This month, that's
> > > > > > > >> >> Pakistan.
> > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > >> > I ask because ALL the alarmists say is that we will have MORE
> > > > > > > >> > and STRONGER storms, so WHERE ARE THEY???
> > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > >> Well, you would first need to wipe all the TrumpShitSmear off
> > > > > > > >> your face and eyes, because it is your horse blinders.
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> The weather has changed. You must have been stinking under a rock
> > > > > > > >> for the last 3 decades.
> > > > > > > >> No... wait... you were stinking up Donald John Trump's fat skanky
> > > > > > > >> ass. Even worse. You stink, boy.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > I see that Decayed Brain Matter is so far submerged in her
> > > > > > > > s*it-filled gutter that she can't explain why the storms aren't
> > > > > > > > appearing.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > You cannot explain why your retarded statistic does not matter. I can.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Well, you DIDN'T.
> > > > >
> > > > > Not in any way that Gnatguy could understand. Gnatguy is close enough to brain dead that it's difficult to present information in a way that he could follow, and he's remarkably resistant to processing information that might force him to recognise that he'd got anything wrong. Most of what he posts is wrong, which compounds the problem.
> > > >
> > > > Hey, produce your so-called STATISTICS or SHUT UP!
> > >
> > > I did, but you decided that they weren't the kind of statistics that you wanted to see. You can't do rational argument. so you have to rely on denial.
> >
> > Hey Bozo, no, you DIDN'T produce any statistics WHATSOEVER. If single factoids are your idea of statistics you need to go back to GRADE SCHOOL! Hint: statistics analyze trends.
> Liar.
>
>formatting link>
> Once you've got the statistics you can process them to extract trends, but when they are as sparse as north Atlantic hurricane numbers, it's scarcely worth the effort.
>
> Nobody teaches that kind of statistical analysis in grade school - I got permutations and combinations in final year mathematics in secondary school in Tasmania, but my undergraduate companions in Victoria, where I went to university, weren't so lucky. The subject did show up in Theory of Computation 1 when I took it as a graduate student, but it still isn't statistics.
>
> Of course I've now got my father's copy of George W Snedecor's 1949 book "Statistical Methods" on my bookshelf - I grabbed it after my father died in 1997 - but my Ph.D. thesis credits W.C. Hamilton's 1964 "Statistics in Physical Science" which I found and read in the Physics Library at Melbourne. The Chemistry library didn't have anything as useful.
>
> I could have asked my wife - she had been known to give lectures on statistical methods for psychologists to undergraduate classes - but they deal with rather different data.
>
> --
> Bill Sloman. Sydney
HA HA HA HA!!! Bozo spends A LOT of time telling us why he CAN'T or WON'T produce the statistics, including blaming his WIFE!
BOZO: Produce the statistics or APOLOGIZE for telling me to do the same!!!!!