> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > GnatTurd snipped-for-privacy@yahoo.com wrote in
> > > > > > > > > > > > news: snipped-for-privacy@googlegroups.com:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > <snip>
> > > > > > > > > > > > Esssentially, you little punk f*ck of a gnat turd, you could not
> > > > > > > > > > > > understand bigger picture elements of a nation if your pathetic
> > > > > > > > > > > > little gnat turd ass depended on it.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Well, you're right on one count: things DO take time. And at the rate that senile Joe Biden is going transitioning to a 100% clean energy grid will take CENTURIES, not the 13 years he has mandated.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > So you have found Joe Biden's plan, which you persistently claim doesn't exist. You don't like it, and think that it won't work, but that's because he's a Democrat.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > It's not as if you have a clue what is involved.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > It's actually much the same sort of expansion that the US electricity generation and transmission system went through from 1950 to 2000 - after which it stopped growing for a bit - without any particular fuss. The fact that you are choosing to have panic attacks about it now reflects the fact that you have to find something nasty to say about the Democrat administration and are silly enough to pick this subject, which reminds people how the Republicans more or less created ENRON and it's crimes.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Hey, you CAN'T dislike something that DOESN'T EXIST, which accurately describes Joe Biden's non-plan to expand the energy grid.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > It doesn't. Gnatguy couldn't do "accurate" if his life depended on it.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Hey, that is WHAT I said, Joe Biden's plan DOESN'T EXIST! > > > > > >
> > > > > > That's what you say. What you mean is that you deny that it exists, and you'd keep up that denial if you were walked through it by a platoon of experts.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Not that anybody would waste their time trying to explain it to an incoherent idiot like you.
> > > > >
> > > > > Hey, don't bother replying until you have actually FOUND Joe Biden's plan.
> > > >
> > > >formatting link
> > > >
> > > > You - of course - deny that it is any kind of plan. Your rationale for this bizarre proposition seems to be that the Democrats can't do anything right so that even if it looks like a plan (or at least a scheme to work out a plan), there's no need for you to take it seriously.
> > > >
> > > > Since you lack the wit to produce any kind of coherent objection, one can see why you adopt this line of argument. A moron like you couldn't do better no matter how hard he tried.
> > >
> > > LOL! Hey, do you actually call this a PLAN? If so you have been sold that beach front land I was referring to.
> >
> > 'You do seem to have been suckered by Donald Trump's deceitful propaganda. >
> Since when has Trump declared that the grid will be "green" by 2050? You are just out of ideas.
I was referring to his more immediate scepticism about the Democrats being able to do anything right.
Trump will be dead by 2050, and won't have any opinion about how the US should generate it's electricity that far into the future.
> > At best this is a BAND-AID, to more effectively use the dimensioning generation capacity.
> >
> > Maybe Gnatguy intended to type "diminishing". Whatever. US electrical generation capacity is going to have to start rising again, after being pretty much static since 2000. Solar cells and windmills will let them do it cheaply, though they will to add some grid storage to the mix. The batteries in electric vehicle could provide some of that.
> It is going to "have to" start rising again? Well, it will be DESPITE any planning by Joe Biden, who has NO PLAN WHATSOEVER!
Gnatguy has his nonsnesical slogans lined up and he spits them out.
> > Go to EIA.gov to find out what the electrical demand growth is and get back to us.
> > If you meant
> >
> >formatting link> >
> > why didn't you post the link?
>
> Are you a f****ng dork that can't use the Internet? I TOLD you where to find it, you blithering idiot!
But you didn't tell me which bit of it you'd failed to comprehend.
> It talks about projections, but isn't all that helpful. They do provide a range. Which one did you have in mind?
>
> The EIA, a government agency, knows FAR MORE than Joe Biden. They KNOW it is NOT POSSIBLE to be 100% "green" by 2050.
What makes you think that they "know" that? It doesn't happen to be true, and while individual EIA personnel might have been bribed by the fossil carbon extraction industry to say this, you haven't even posted a link to the relevant lie.
> I'm being sarcastic here. You haven't got a mind, and you've clearly never been anywhere near that web-site.
>
> Yeah, so WHY did I reference it ???
Probably because you found the URL in some of the right-wing drivel you read. Actually clicking on it would have been beyond you.