Protest Irony

Mar 24, 2020 7 Replies

Trump seems hell bent on minimizing damage to the economy rather than damag e to the population of the US. He is spouting the same rhetoric that Larki n does saying the doctors want to "shut down the entire world".



I fully expect that if he tries to lift the isolation orders the states hav e put in place there will be a groundswell against him. In other times it might result in protests in the streets. But how can citizens who want to maintain a shut down assemble to protest?



It's a sad irony.



Can the guy really be so unhinged to think that we are anywhere near close to being able to lift restrictions? No, that's literally not his concern. He is worried that a busted economy will keep him from being reelected. H e is so worried that rather than try to find the optimum path, he is willin g to allow us to medically being bombed back to the stone age and remain th ere.



Even if he makes the move too early, realizes his mistake and relents, it w ill be too late. This is literally a once in a lifetime event. There will be no do overs. We need to have leaders who understand the implications o f opening this pandora's box and are willing to keep the lid on until it is safe.



This is one time when I am so glad we have strong states rights.


Rick C. - Get 2,000 miles of free Supercharging - Tesla referral code - https://ts.la/richard11209

Or, to change one word of a Nazi Propagands during wartime: "Ecomomy mus live even if we must die"

Good luck

Uwe Bonnes bon@elektron.ikp.physik.tu-darmstadt.de Institut fuer Kernphysik Schlossgartenstrasse 9 64289 Darmstadt --------- Tel. 06151 1623569 ------- Fax. 06151 1623305 ---------

He is nasty and obsessed. He is rabidly anti-Trump hence pro-virus. Ignore him.

John Larkin Highland Technology, Inc The cork popped merrily, and Lord Peter rose to his feet. "Bunter", he said, "I give you a toast. The triumph of Instinct over Reason"

do you suppose Trump has read the journal paper showing that the therapeutic ratio of chloroquine on e.g. related MERS-CoV is very narrow in vitro, it don't look good as a viable "cure"

snipped-for-privacy@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote in news: snipped-for-privacy@4ax.com:

from

Here is Larkin doing his best to be more TrumpTainted & Trumplike.

"Ignore him"

Like Trump has us. He went golfing last week, two weeks ago, three weeks ago...

You, like Trump, are nasty and retarded.

The first link doesn't seem to say what you are saying by reading the abstract. The second link is not viewable. It contains a message on where to find COVID-19 information and a link to itself, unless I missed something.

The worst I can find is where it says, "Although they may not necessarily reduce viral replication to very low levels, a moderate viral load reduction may create a window during which to mount a protective immune response."

Not very damning.

Rick C. + Get 1,000 miles of free Supercharging + Tesla referral code - https://ts.la/richard11209

Try this one:

in vitro selectivity index = CC50/EC50 = 20; EC50 is half-maximal response and CC50 is 50% of your test cells are dead from toxicity of the agent itself. That's not great

Thanks. I guess it works at lower doses for other on-label uses.

Rick C. -- Get 1,000 miles of free Supercharging -- Tesla referral code - https://ts.la/richard11209

Join the Discussion

Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.

Didn't find your answer?

Ask the community — no account required