politics, sorry, but this is great (2023 Update)

That is total drivel. Completely.

I am a socialist in my politics - I am strongly left-wing. (That's completely different from "communist", for those Americans who don't understand politics - more like the social democracies of northern Europe, though I am quite left-wing even by Norwegian standards.)

That is /completely/ independent from being a social person. I'm not very social, and never have been.

Political socialism is about wanting your country to be better for people as a whole, rather than for individuals - it's about wanting a state that provides good schools and health care for everyone regardless of their economic state, at the expense of less choice for those with more money. It's about wanting a flatter society with fewer differences between the haves and the have-nots.

That has no relation whatsoever to how personally social a person might be.

It is not more "tribal" - it is aiming for a wider society, which would be the opposite of the closed, territorial and tribal view from the political right. It is not "unhappy" in any sense - nor does it even make sense to talk about the "traditional norms of human behaviour". (Although you could say that anyone whose personal politics differs significantly from the society around them is likely to be less happy - whether the difference is to the left or the right.)

And no, it is not remotely "more afraid". The more right-wing and capitalist a society is, the more afraid people are. Those with lots of money are afraid others will take it from them - criminals, the state, or other people. Those with little money are afraid they are one step away from having nothing - in the USA, losing your job can easily mean losing your house and the whole family losing access to health care. In a more socialist country you have a more even and trusting society, and are safe and happy both with other people and with the authorities and state. And you know that if something goes terribly wrong in your life

- such as losing your job or getting seriously ill - you have a safety net to limit the consequences. That makes you happier, less worried and less afraid.

I don't think you /see/ anything except what you choose to look at in order to bolster your screwed-up views.

Reply to
David Brown
Loading thread data ...

Again - ignorance is bliss.

Of course they are - because many kids today have a far better grasp of reality and science than you do. Previous generations have totally disregarded the abuse of the planet and overuse of resources - they have been happy to push the problems on to the future generations. You and your like have been happy in the knowledge that you'll be dead before the seas swamp your cities so it is not /your/ problem. Now we have people who starting to realise that /they/ are the ones that have to do something about it, and /they/ are the ones who will be suffering the consequences of their parents' and grandparents' greed. And they are right to be afraid.

That, however, has nothing at all to do with being conservative or socialist, or right-wing or left-wing. It has to do with education, understanding, empathy, science, and paying attention to the world around you.

Reply to
David Brown

David Brown snipped-for-privacy@hesbynett.no wrote in news:srv735$jiu$ snipped-for-privacy@dont-email.me:

  • a friggin' million!

Good job, David, of pegging Larkin right on the mark. Quite socially, rewarding reading your take.

Reply to
DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno

Imaginary straw people again.

Reply to
jlarkin

Tribal name-calling is not rational thought or discussion.

Reply to
jlarkin

I never claimed to be any winger. I belong to no political parties. I'm just interested in human dynamics, especially as it affects engineering. Which it sure does.

I was stopped at a red light yesterday on Monterey, at the freeway entrance. A huge flock of black birds, a tight cluster of a few hundred, was flailing around the sky apparently randomly. They looked like a giant black water balloon in a tornado. I tried to see if any bird was in the lead and it sure didn't look like it. Just when the light turned green, they all dived together and disappeared into a tree.

Made me think of tribes of people. Similar dynamics, group action with nobody in charge.

Reply to
jlarkin

Previous generations, many by now, have predicted imminent doom: peak oil, global cooling, mass starvation, using up all the metals. It hasn't happened; things keep getting better. Nobody seems to be pointing out to the kids how well off they are by historical standards. Ungrateful little brats.

You and

You're being tribal again. Beats thinking.

have been happy in the knowledge that you'll be dead before

At 2 mm per year, we'll probably have another ice age before we drown. Being a mile deep in ice *would* be a lot worse than ankle-deep in warm sea water. Make more CO2.

The big sea level problem in coastal cities is manmade subsidence from pumping out groundwater. Bad for real estate values for the beach villas.

Reply to
jlarkin

Not scared, just rationally prudent about a common hazard. Besides, I don't like wake up with random strangers who might make bad coffee.

I do appreciate that having accidents and diseases and lawsuits are a boring nuisance. If I am afraid of anything, it's boredom.

But group dynamics interests me, and I'm not a group.

Old hens tend to group. They cluck and my-o-my together.

The same ones? Another made-up population to mock.

STDs are rarely lethal any more. But they can be dangerous to a partner. You might have fun and leave her infertile. The more people you sleep with, the bigger germ pool you play in.

Things like herpes can be a nuisance too.

Reply to
jlarkin

See your later comment, below.

Pot. Kettle. Black. (ref your original article)

Clearly David's points are too subtle and long for you to bother to read them. Instead your response is to reflexively ignore them and therefore dismiss them.

Some people are so hidebound they can't /think/ anymore.

Reply to
Tom Gardner

Conservatives are particularly prone to that; libertarians more so.

Reply to
Tom Gardner

** Totally delusional thinking.

JL's quote is from mad Greta - who simply has no grasp of anything. But at least she has the excuse of being a child stooge for other's ambitions.

Lefty fuckwits like Brown have no excuse whatever.

..... Phil

Reply to
Phil Allison

Anarchists Unite!

The only common goal of libertarians is to be left alone.

The problem with coercive group action, passing laws to tax and control everything, is that very few people understand how societies and economies really work. Control usually degrades to group power and self-interest and gross inefficiency.

It's better in those situations to allow a zillion random experiments and allow the successful ones to grow. That's the way most things have been invented.

Reply to
jlarkin

She seems to be an industry. It will be interesting to follow her life.

Reply to
jlarkin

And some people, namely most people here, switch to personal insults instead of considering objective opinions.

Reply to
jlarkin

If only John Doe were imaginary. Sadly, he's real enough to post his nonsense here all too often.

Reply to
Anthony William Sloman

But John Larkin doesn't do anything else.

" But it's not. Socialists are literally more social than the average person. Leftists believe in collective action to govern everybody."

That's communists, not socialists.

"They are more dogmatic, more tribal, more unhappy with the traditional norms of human behavior. More afraid. "

That's merely irrational nonsense - tribal name-calling.

Reply to
Anthony William Sloman

snipped-for-privacy@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote: ===============================

** Called neurotics.

** Sensible fear.

** Autistic neurotics.

** As if you could ever tell.
** Phobias about seeing blood, one own or others are not unusual.
** A basic, self protection instinct.
** Utter bullshit.

.... Phil

Reply to
Phil Allison

John Larkin does seem to be prize example of the breed.

" Being social, tribal, means that one is hypersensitive to group behavior and peer pressure. And afraid of rejection by peers. That means, in engineering, doing everything by the book and being inhibited against presenting radical ideas. I see this all the time."

He likes to think that this is what he sees - what he is actually seeing is people being rude about his silly ideas, and he's too silly to realise that they are right.

Reply to
Anthony William Sloman

Don't be silly; climate change is susceptible to investigation and contemplation without regard to optimism, or fear, or argyle socks. You do need awareness, wisdom, and some measure of worldwide cooperative action (even if it's only to compare notes).

You sound like everyone's granddad.

Reply to
whit3rd

I wonder how much time David spent on writing that post. It's the sort of thing I'd expect to find published in the "Opinion" section of a good newspaper.

Reply to
corvid

ElectronDepot website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.