Every time I want to do something with LTspice I have to fight the UI something wicked. Doing anything relating to commands is pure torture.
I eventually figured out how to do what I wanted, but it is amazing how poor not only the UI is, but the documentation. I have learned programming languages by reading the manuals. But I can't decipher the .MEAS statement in LTspice along with many other features.
Please be advised, LTspice and those like it are real programs designed for serious users in mind looking for real productivity tools for those that are PRODUCTIVE.
I get a lot of use out of LT Spice. It just took a few minutes to figure out the basics of entering a schematic and running a transient analysis. It's much friendlier than some others that I've used (like EWB) and a lot cheaper too.
It's easy enough to use that I also use it instead of a calculator, for simple things like voltage dividers and time constants and opamp resistor calcs. I confess that I've also used it to design LC filters by pure fiddling. Instinct and simulation can get you a long way.
The HELP could be a lot better. The spotty HELP make it a lot harder to do some things. There are other resources online, but they take some digging, and many just repeat one another. One of the best kept secrets is the space bar.
I suspect that part of the motivation and value of the Analog Devices purchase of LTC was LT Spice; a couple of billion dollars worth maybe. I've heard that ADI will be migrating to LT Spice for their parts.
I wish the scissors icon and the run icon looked more different; I tend to click the wrong one.
--
John Larkin Highland Technology, Inc
lunatic fringe electronics
I think most people who have used, and swear by LTspice have never used, or even been exposed to, a professional simulation tool. ...Jim Thompson
--
| James E.Thompson | mens |
| Analog Innovations | et |
| Analog/Mixed-Signal ASIC's and Discrete Systems | manus |
| STV, Queen Creek, AZ 85142 Skype: skypeanalog | |
| Voice:(480)460-2350 Fax: Available upon request | Brass Rat |
| E-mail Icon at http://www.analog-innovations.com | 1962 |
Thinking outside the box... producing elegant solutions.
I agree. Or actually design ICs that have to work when sold in the millions per month range.
The reality, is that of the 3,000,000 downloads, the bulk are used by students and amateurs. By that I mean this.
The bulk of all electronics is IC electronics. That is, billions and billions of 10,000s of different products, sold every year are integrated circuits. The number of products with no ICs, is pretty much in the noise. This ranges from TVs, medical scanners, mobile phones, you name it, it is IC based.
None of these designs (except maybe Linear Tech :-) ) are taped out using LTSpice. Its all professional tools, costing real money. Yeah, I am making a statement without actually have provable numbers, but maybe the one that does, don't post here to contradict me.
John. Not a chance in a billion that LTSpice has a business worth even remotely near that value. Its a freebe, so it would be simply impossible to justify it as shareholder value as anything more than dubious "goodwill".
*The* fundamental reason companies buy other companies, is to take their
*existing customers*, via the *products* that they *sell*. Its because the other company is eating into their markets or markets they want to enter. Its that simple. It has to be hard profit and loss quantifiable motives, that convince investors and shareholders.
I propose that LTSpice played no part whatsoever in Analog Devices decision. Lets see if Mike pops up to contradict me.
I just set the keyboard shortcut for 'run' to F5, which is familiar from various C++ IDEs such as Visual Studio.
Cheers
Phil Hobbs
--
Dr Philip C D Hobbs
Principal Consultant
ElectroOptical Innovations LLC
Optics, Electro-optics, Photonics, Analog Electronics
160 North State Road #203
Briarcliff Manor NY 10510
hobbs at electrooptical dot net
http://electrooptical.net
I really doubt the Linear Tech uses LTspice for design, except, perhaps, an in-house version as the engine immersed into a Cadence environment. ...Jim Thompson
--
| James E.Thompson | mens |
| Analog Innovations | et |
| Analog/Mixed-Signal ASIC's and Discrete Systems | manus |
| STV, Queen Creek, AZ 85142 Skype: skypeanalog | |
| Voice:(480)460-2350 Fax: Available upon request | Brass Rat |
| E-mail Icon at http://www.analog-innovations.com | 1962 |
Thinking outside the box... producing elegant solutions.
Observing that Analog Devices simulator is web-based only, "in the Cloud", I can guess where LTspice is headed >:-} ...Jim Thompson
--
| James E.Thompson | mens |
| Analog Innovations | et |
| Analog/Mixed-Signal ASIC's and Discrete Systems | manus |
| STV, Queen Creek, AZ 85142 Skype: skypeanalog | |
| Voice:(480)460-2350 Fax: Available upon request | Brass Rat |
| E-mail Icon at http://www.analog-innovations.com | 1962 |
Thinking outside the box... producing elegant solutions.
I agree, John. I never simulate my entire design, just parts of it to answer my immediate questions. Then I go to the bench.
I bought SuperSpice some years ago and found it almost impossible to use even with Kevin's help. That is why I now use LTSpice. It is friendly and just works. By digging a little, its usefulness can be greatly increased. Also, it seems to be used by many respected professional engineers on this group.
I'm a longtime user of Intusoft's SPICE. It has superior schematic entry and output graphing and both are more amenable to publishable stuff. I've played with LTSpice on and off, but the UI sucks and I'm not impressed with the graphing, except maybe for super-long plots for SMPS evaluation, what it was designed for in the first place.
Most of LTspice's won't run on any other simulator... which I consider to be a very STUPID marketing move.
And it was done quite purposefully... several years ago I noticed that updates were replacing Berkeley-compliant models with encrypted versions that run only on LTspice, so I quickly saved all their models to a separate directory.
So I only use LTspice to verify that my model writings will run there as well as on Berkeley-compliant simulators... at the insistence of clients ;-)
As for the UI sucking... sucking a Chandler Heights (*) sized LEMON... usually the size of soft balls... for those of you unaware of the Arizona citrus trade.
(*) Two miles to the west of me.
As for IntuSoft's Spice, pretty good simulator engine, but GUI and post-processing still not up to original-flavor MicroSim PSpice (which I have used since DOS days with hand-written netlists :-) ...Jim Thompson
--
| James E.Thompson | mens |
| Analog Innovations | et |
| Analog/Mixed-Signal ASIC's and Discrete Systems | manus |
| STV, Queen Creek, AZ 85142 Skype: skypeanalog | |
| Voice:(480)460-2350 Fax: Available upon request | Brass Rat |
| E-mail Icon at http://www.analog-innovations.com | 1962 |
Thinking outside the box... producing elegant solutions.
Kev is obviously heavily biased against LT because he views it as a free and unwelcome alternative to his SS, so his denigratory remarks have to be seen in that light.
--
| James E.Thompson | mens |
| Analog Innovations | et |
| Analog/Mixed-Signal ASIC's and Discrete Systems | manus |
| STV, Queen Creek, AZ 85142 Skype: skypeanalog | |
| Voice:(480)460-2350 Fax: Available upon request | Brass Rat |
| E-mail Icon at http://www.analog-innovations.com | 1962 |
Thinking outside the box... producing elegant solutions.
I don't publish stuff, I sell stuff; different application. I see nothing wrong with the schematic entry or the graphing. I can enter and sim a simple circuit in a couple of minutes. I have sent screen shots to customers and put them in manuals. They are plenty good enough.
I've
I works fine for me.
--
John Larkin Highland Technology, Inc
lunatic fringe electronics
ElectronDepot website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here.
All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.