Ping Bil Slowman; The global warming hoax reveiled

On a sunny day (Sun, 29 Nov 2009 16:05:30 -0800 (PST)) it happened Bill Sloman wrote in :

I think you are just repeating yourself. Well, ice ages will come, ice ages will go. And *unless* we change earth's orbit etc etc (terra forming), it will repeat. You and the CO2 storage under your bed in your green grass hut, will NEVER make any difference. But if it gets really cold, or bleeding hot, and you have only windmills and solar cells... Too bad for the children's children. So.. forget about all the AGW stuff, build power plants. And be prepared to accept that nature will change the face of the earth, where people live. That is the reality, AGW dreams is just talk, sales talk at that.

happenedBill Sloman

media, no energy=

goods, the=

some paper man=

these

doesn't know

scientists?

quite

Joerg schrieb:

Hello,

but 96 % of all studied glaciers are shrinking. What is the use of argumenting only with a very small minority?

Bye

Joerg schrieb:

Hello,

the snow falling on the glacier of Mt. Shasta to keep it growing couldnt fall as rain somewhere else.

Bye

John Larkin schrieb:

Hello,

when the sea level is rising due to melting ice and warming seawater, the flooding of all low level areas at the coast will cause tremendous cost. Think about New Orleans and New York, London, Hamburg, Amsterdam and lot more big cities by the sea on a very low level.

Bye

Jon Kirwan schrieb:

Hello,

Bye

Uninformed leftist loon. ...Jim Thompson

If sea level rise is real, it might be a problem.

John

Do you design electronics? Tell us about it.

John

at

He's gotta be maxed out over his heart. That's no fun. Maybe we should have mercy, lest he explode it.

-- Cheers, James Arthur

Cooking the books:

Cheers! Rich

Agonizing and arguing over something you can't affect (ie, AGW and Exxon) is a sure source of stress, and longterm stress is a cardiovascular killer. Designing and building electronics, on the other hand, is both satisfying and relaxing.

John

Cheers! Rich

I'm aware of the general figures. A very interesting paper recently came out, because it provides a greatly expanded update of estimates of global average balance of small glaciers, from Cogley, J. G., 2009, "Geodetic and direct mass-balance measurements: comparison and joint analysis." It's available, in full, here:

Another, from Kaser et al., 2006, "Mass balance of glaciers and ice caps: Consensus estimates for 1961?2004?" is here:

For those interested in a wonderful web page with a great many links of the papers used in the recent Copenhagen Diagnosis, I'd refer them here:

It is an incredible resource of papers that won't cost a cent.

Gruesse, Jon

Bill mentioned "the glaciers aren't going to be coming back any time soon" which isn't right. Quite a few do, right now, and it is necessary to find an explanation why they do. Given the precipitation link I posted we don't seem to have a sufficient explanation (yet).