OT: Seattle is DYING - thanks to a LIBTARD city council, judges and head prosecutor

Cursitor Doom imagines himself to be a prosecutor. He's aspiring to be a persecutor, but since he is nearly as stupid as Flyguy, he's just looking like an idiot. I suppose I could sue for libel, but the defense would argue that nobody sane would take Cursitor Doom. I certainly don't.

Reply to
Bill Sloman
Loading thread data ...

Cursitor Doom displaying his usual capacity for re-imagining reality in a way that makes him feel better.

He, Flyguy, and John Doe do say unpleasant things about me from time to time. Nobody sane is going to take them seriously, and they resent that too.

Cursitor Doom presumably hopes to be included in the amnesty. Faint hope. People who make useful contributions the discussions here, even if only intermittently, do get cut some slack. Sadly for him, he isn't one of them.

Reply to
Bill Sloman

Well, we BOTH are infinitely smarter than you, SL0WMAN. Cursitor Doom would make a FAR BETTER prosecutor than the idiot in Seattle, Pete Holmes, who doesn't prosecute hardly anything. You have to commit a 2nd degree felony, or worse, to get his attention. And, then, he releases most of them. He is bought and paid for by George Soros:

formatting link

Reply to
Flyguy

I don't expect SL0WMAN to grow up in this lifetime, but you may.

Reply to
Flyguy

Flyguy clearly doesn't know what "infinitely" means, which rather undercuts the claim. He's got about 86 billion nerve cells, which makes him smarter that a nematode which had perhaps 130, but not infinitely smarter.

Probably incorrect. Of course the double negative does add an extra idiotic component.

Seems unlikely. I've snipped Flyguy's link - with his record there's no point in reading anything he might think he likes.

Reply to
Bill Sloman

Flyguy has ossified, and may be dementing. Growing up isn't something he's likely to be able to manage. Decadent Linux User Numero Uno actually is tolerably grown up. Any change to something that Flyguy liked better wouldn't be an improvement..

Reply to
Bill Sloman

Hey SL0WMAN, your bad spelling is a sign of your cognitive decline, and your lies are a sign of your not so quiet life of desperation.

Reply to
Flyguy

I do make typos from time to time, but they aren't any kind of indicator of cognitive decline. You do seem to think that any statement with which you disagree can be described as a lie, which indicates a certain cognitive inadequacy on your part, and you seem to have some bizarre ideas about the way I live and the way I feel about it, which also reflect much the same kind of cognitive inadequacy on your part.

Reply to
Bill Sloman

Hey SL0WMAN, come and visit Seattle, and THEN tell me it is unlikely. If you actually WATCHED those videos you would have all of the PROOF you need, you fool. But, oh no, not the KNOW IT ALL SL0WMAN - he already knows the answer, the FOOL he is. On the other hand, SL0WMAN is likely LYING about this and knows FULL WELL what is happening in Seattle.

SL0WMAN is in such an extreme state of denial that I normally would call that moronic, but that would be an insult to morons.

Reply to
Flyguy

.

I think you just imagine that I talked about occasional things that I did. I do not talk about things I did because I have been retired for over 20 years and I do not think anyone here would be interested in old stories.

My employers not only paid me well , but asked me to come back to work on two occasions to train new employees.

What a crock. Harvard does have alumnae that are well informed , but you try to make that be a negative thing. And Harvard has not been involved in inside trading. Just more of your make believe stories.. Much like your bit about people bribing to get their children accepted at colleges. Just crap that you try to imply that Harvard was involved.

It is exactly the kind of boast that has real value. Real dollars involved. How much money did all your patents net you? 10,000$ ? Money is how we keep score.

So back to Better University , Higher IQ, and much more MONEY

Dan

Reply to
dcaster

Except that you did.

So you weren't bright enough that it was difficult to find people who could be trained up to do what you did.

It would be Harvard alumi, not the institution itself. Harvard does have huge endowments, which are very well managed and make a lot of money out of rather specialised kinds of investment. Thomas Piketty in "Capital in the 21st Century" mentions these university endowments as example of ways in which having a lot money can allow you to get a larger return on the capital invested. Insider trading - helpful advice from alumni - may be part of the mix.

formatting link
You seem to have snipped my original link. Here's another. Harvard is not specifically mentioned. One of the tips for getting into Harvard seems to be " “Encourage your ultra-wealthy parents to donate a building” but since the student assessment process is secret, nobody knows quite what that is worth. Having parents or grandparents who went there can help, but the college predictably suggests that it doesn't help much

None of my patents ever made me any money at all. Money is definitely one way to keep score, but it is scarcely the only one (unless money is all you've got, which does seem to be your situation).

Except that you don't know how much money I've got, your university education didn't do anything for you that you can boast about, and your score on a paper and pencil IQ test was probably faked at the same time as the qualifications that got you into Harvard. A score of 158 is almost four standard deviations away from the average.

That would imply that you were cleverer than 99.95% of the population. Here you come across as average when it comes to reasoning and dumb when it comes to processing new ideas.

Reply to
Bill Sloman

Flyguy snipped-for-privacy@yahoo.com wrote in news: snipped-for-privacy@googlegroups.com:

Except tat I was not referring to Sloman, you retarded, illiterate f*****ad.

Reply to
DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno

If I'd actually watched those videos, I'd have a clearer idea of what of what Flyguy might consider to be evidence, which is to say what an idiot would imagine might support his silly ideas.This isn't any kind of useful information. All we need to know about Flyguy is that he is an idiot, and he provides abundant evidence of this irritatingly frequently.

I don't have to know much to know more than Flyguy.

I know enough to know that mainstream media isn't wildly excited about it, one way or the other.

Flyguy gets very hurt when we don't take him seriously. Seattle is clearly suffering from the America-wide failure to manage the Covid-19 epidemic better. Flyguy wants to blame all the problems on politicians he doesn't like, like every other right-wing idiot. He might be able to blame a fair number of them on Donald Trump, who didn't do well, but Flyguy is stupid enough to like Trump, so those - numerous - mistakes get ignored.

Reply to
Bill Sloman

<snipped the usual right-wing nonsense>

The idiot right doesn't like anything that isn't lunatic far right. Nothing new there either.

Reply to
Bill Sloman

Hey SL0WMAN, all of your INVECTIVE BULLSHIT is a clear indicator of your cognitive decline - smart people can make smart arguments and not have to resort to name calling. And, again, if you are as bright as you claim you would NOT make all of the spelling mistakes that you do. Hint: in the future, when you call me (or anyone else) STUPD be damn sure that you spell "stupid" correctly!

Reply to
Flyguy

Sometimes I think that SL0WMAN isn't even a real person, but a libtard bot, except that a bot would, at least, spell words correctly.

Reply to
Flyguy

I do not think I did. Please post what you think I posted about things I did. Other wise admit you just made it up,

I trained them to do their job. I did not train them to do my former job, dumb shit.

The best way to get into Harvard is to be your high school valivictorian. That is what I did.

But I do know how much money I have. And I am pretty sure it is more than what you have your university education didn't do anything for you that you can boast about, and your score on a paper and pencil IQ test was probably faked at the same time as the qualifications that got you into Harvard. A score of 158 is almost four standard deviations away from the average. Funny but my SAT , Navy GCT, and Lockheeds IQ test all agree with each other. i

Not a big deal. That is just one every 10,000.

Higher IQ, Better University, and a bunch of money Dan

Reply to
dcaster

I'm going to search sci.electronics.design just to prove that your memory isn't up to much? I don't take you that seriously.

What other job would you be able to train them to do?

So you haven't read "Capital in the 21st Century".

There are a lot more high school validictorians than there are places at Harvard. This advice is telling people to buy a ticket in a lottery where there are very few winners.

Confidence is admirable, The pratfall when it turns out to be unjustified can be gratifying.

And none of them correlate all that well with real world intellectual skills. And there is a problem with test-sophisticated individuals that you don't seem to have heard about.

That would be 99.98% of the population. 99.9% of the population who fall within four standard deviations of the mean covers 999 out of 1000. The distribution is supposed to be symmetrical so there's an even chance that the one one outlier is exceptional bright or exceptionally dumb. That would make you a one in 2000 outlier.

The fact that you couldn't work that out is revealing.

And a spectacular capacity for self-delusion.

Reply to
Bill Sloman

Sounds like you have had one drink too many...

Reply to
Flyguy

Sounds like a perfectly sober assessment to me, perhaps erring a bit on the charitable side. Flyguy is an anti-social cretin. If he were a little bit less stupid he might qualify as malicious but that carries an implication of persistent evil intent, while Flyguy is merely nasty on a moment to moment basis.

Reply to
Bill Sloman

ElectronDepot website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.