That invitation to send me an email at snipped-for-privacy@post.harvard.edu was to every one. Regardless of what Bill says , it really does prove that I graduated from Harvard.
Better university , higher IQ, and more money.
Dan
He may well have gone to Harvard (or have a friend in their computer systems administration). Harvard - today - is high in the pecking order of preferred universities, and the university that I went to - Melbourne in Australia - isn't as high (but still pretty good). The fact that he got in suggests that he might have been a bright kid, but it could also be evidence that his parents knew the right people to bribe.
But I do know how utterly stupid you are now,
Whatever caused the brain damage that you exhibit here may be recent. I was advising against you flying again. The same brain damage may also allow you to fantasise about thousand of hours of accident free flight that never really happened. Or you might just have been lucky.
But nothing real to boast about.
Usual drivel from the guy that can't spell STUPD.
Flyguy is too stupid to notice that I can spell "stupid". I do it frequently in posts that respond to him. He's fixated on the memory that I once made a typo and left out the "i", and is too dumb to stop harping on it.
This is really very stupid, but that's our Flyguy.
Flyguy snipped-for-privacy@yahoo.com wrote in news: snipped-for-privacy@googlegroups.com:
You are an abject idiot.
Flyguy snipped-for-privacy@yahoo.com wrote in news: snipped-for-privacy@googlegroups.com:
You are an idiot, and Trump got his ass kicked by 85 million REAL Americans, and every last one of you 74 million idiots sucked up to an NYC criminal's lies and pure bullshit, and you took an instant 50 point IQ hit in doing so.
America was already great, dumbfuck, and we will recover from the damage Trump did. All while you jailhouse mentality retards wallow in your lost face stupidity.
Representative John Kavanaugh of Arizona's electoral commission came out and said it directly what he believes the problem is, that too many people are able to vote, period.
"Not everybody wants to vote, and if somebody is uninterested in voting, that probably means that they're totally uninformed on the issues," Kavanagh said. "Quantity is important, but we have to look at the quality of votes, as well."
In essence, he figures if you can find a way to check to make sure all votes cast are votes for Republican candidates before counting them, the Republicans would really have it made.
Still citing from the Wikipedia then, Bill? I guess we shouldn't be too surprised as it's perfect for lazy bastards seeking glib answers. The kind of people who can't be bothered to do any proper book-based research. Perfect for someone of your level. If you want to know about psychopathy, I suggest you read 'Without Conscience' by Robert Hare. Dr. Hare developed the checklist used by psychiatric practitioners and forensic psychiatrists the world over. They refer to that, Bill. Not some half-backed online source that anyone - including everyone you despise - can meddle with.
YOU started it. Probably as some sort of distraction so readers would not notice your own inability to post anything cogent and well-reasoned.
<snip>
I'd run into a more or less real psychopath long before Wikipedia existed, and read up on it a bit then. In this case Wikipedia served up the usual widely available basics in a convenient place.
Did it many years ago. You clearly haven't.
The one's associated with police forces. Dr. Hare looks like the kind of practitioner who tells police what they want to hear.
Robert Hare's psychopathic checklist is what's half-baked. The Wikipedia article on it cites 65 references and is rather less half-baked.
Twerps like you can try to change Wikipedia articles, but it takes an effort, and if people actually read them, your kinds of edits get thrown out rather rapidly.
Cursitor Doom considers his own posts cogent and well-reasoned because he cuts and pastes them from lunatic right-wing propaganda that he likes to read, and is confident that anybody who doesn't take them seriously isn't right in the head.
This isn't brilliant reasoning, but it is the best he can do.
I've read Hare's book years ago, Bill. And much more on the subject besides. None of it from Wikipedia.
I prefer the PCL-22 scoring system. Entering only the answers I know to be correct for you as evidenced by your posts to this forum, you come out as a borderline psychopath. However, I have been unable to enter data relating to your early life, relationship history, early tendency towards criminal behavior, cruelty to animals, impulsivity and so on which would be required to make a more complete diagnosis. But even if you scored a perfect zero on the unknown parameters, you would *still* come out as a borderline psychopath. And I'm very skeptical indeed that you wouldn't score on those other aspects. VERY skeptical indeed....
Except that you haven't had the training to do it reliably, and you are going to pick the answers that give you the result you want.
They might be useful if you knew what you were doing, but since you don't, your capacity to make a "complete diagnosis" would remain non-existent even if you knew every last detail of my early life, which didn't have any examples of criminal history or cruelty to animals, and probably rather less impulsivity than it should have had.
Of course I would. That's the result you want, and you aren't going to let mere facts get in the way of posting the result you want to post.
And using the American spelling of sceptical to say so. Buttering up Flyguy. You really are a transparent creep.
Plenty to boast about. And I have boasted. but you are not bright enough to notice. If you have a successful career, you get pay raises. And if you are half way smart you invest some of that money you earned. So " more money " translates to successful career. And so I have plenty boast about. The market is up today, and I was expecting Nucor to reach some sort of milestone. But that did not happen today.
Dan
Better university, Higher IQ, and more money
You have talked - once or twice - about occasional things that you have done. You may have seen it as boasting. It looked more like routine experience to me.
Not that much, or all that often.If you keep on doing the same thing, and don't screw up too often, you are predictably useful, and your employers will hang onto you.
Or well-informed friends, which is what Harvard is good at delivering. It can also deliver prosecutions for insider trading, but you have to be pretty greedy to get noticed.
Not exactly the kind of boast that is worth making.
Hey SL0WMAN, not when you called me "STUPD," stupid. Of course, that's between your constant lies.
Flyguy imagines that anything that he doesn't believe is a lie. Life is a little more complicated than that for people with a better grasp of reality than Flyguy - pretty much everybody - but Flyguy does need to keep things very simple.
Flyguy snipped-for-privacy@yahoo.com wrote in news: snipped-for-privacy@googlegroups.com:
How about when someone says Grow The Fuck Up Child. GTFUC
Bill Sloman, you are charged with being a prolific liar who can't spell properly. How do you plead? (I should try to do a deal with the prosecution if I were you.....)
It must be very vexing for poor Bill to feel like such an outstanding failure in life and then long into retirement to find himself mocked and ridiculed relentlessly for all his various and many shortcomings by his betters on this group. Do try to go easy on the poor, hapless blighter, please! :-D
ElectronDepot website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.