I am not trying to sell global warming, but the theory of global warming I saw was such that it would have been better if they had termed it global weather chaos.
In the oceans there are currents that loop a bit like the jet streams in air currents. They function as thermal conveyors and transfer heat from the equatorial areas toward the polar areas. This is actuality.
The scenario is that if these thermal conveyors are stopped the polar regions would get much colder and the equatorial regions would become much hotter.
It never really has actually been about WARMING, per se, but more about a failure of natural systems that mitigate the extremes.
In other words, places like Minnesota or Canada would get COLDER as a result of ""Global Warming"" and Arizona and Mexico would get hotter.
I'm guessing that in this scenario places in a middle band like Kansas would experience much wilder SWINGS and much more energetic weather as a result of even colder air masses colliding with even warmer ones.
None of this would explain Al Gore's spastic waving and pointing at melting glaciers.
What scenario is Al Gore trying to sell?