Other patrons had complained of the 'overheated' coffee in the past. One assumes that there were photographs of burned skin. Depositions were taken. These are evidence that support the theory that someone was harmed.
The transmitter is the ultimate in plausible deniabilty. Any complainant is bound to be labeled a kook, because people will be unaware that the transmitter is being used on them.
No evidence of crime means no crime could have been committed.
You missed the important text, this "Winston" finds personal amusement=20 to be superior to any law or tort repercussions. Please respond=20 to this "Winston" accordingly.
The amusement will exist. There will be no legal repercussions. There will be no evidence, no incriminating depositions. No police reports. People will be harmed by other people but no crime will be committed by definition because engineering has long since left the law behind in at least two critical ways.
Something that exists is superior to something that does not exist in a sense that it can easily enter popular discussion. We discuss amusing things every day.
No one is likely to talk about a lawsuit that never took place and never can take place.
No corporation would come within a mile of it. Even speculative law suits would bankrupt the company. And *thousands* of people would know about the device. Even the design of the A-bomb could not be kept secret.
--
Dirk
http://www.transcendence.me.uk/ - Transcendence UK
http://www.blogtalkradio.com/onetribe - Occult Talk Show
On 3/12/2010 10:37 PM, Dirk Bruere at NeoPax wrote: (...)
Why not? It'll prevent armed robbery in the store. It'll provide welcome entertainment for managers It'll punish recalcitrant employees It'll injure skimpy tippers, customers of the wrong skin color and anyone who 'needed zapping'
No evidence = no lawsuits.
So what? They aren't going to talk, largely because no one would believe them anyway.
By the time the existence of the transmitters becomes public knowledge, they will be accepted as a necessary evil. Pay toilets, toll bridges, dealer service for recall repairs, 130% interest charges on payday loans, "Grace Period" trimming and 'delayed credit for payment' by CC companies etc.
Not in the form that you want. Trans-cranial magnetic stimulation works, but not at frequencies that can be focussed by an ntenna of any practicable size.
You are extrapolating from some particularly ill-designed and unconvincing research done in the 1970's to imagine an anti-personnel weapon that can't - in practice - do what you would like to think it could.
If there was any non-thermal effect at 147MHz - which, granting the subsequent publication history (or lack of it), seems bery unlikely.
I think you have been letting your imagination run away with you.
Disgrantled employee - not every manager has an attractive and sympathetic personality.
Prosecutors just love high profile cases.
Or would be, if it could work.
Or could, if it could work.
A big dish antenna aobe a false ceiling, and the RF transmitter to drive it? A bit harder to hide that a hand-gun, and ripping it out and dumping it off the bridge would be a little more obvious, and leave more obvious traces, clown.
Except the paper trail covers the papyments for the expensive installation, and the memories and records of the sub-contracots who did the work.
Are disgruntled employees particularly powerful in your area of the world? Do they have the power to investigate, arrest, prosecute and jail offenders? In my area of the world, government resources are given to managers in order to steal from disgruntled employees. It is a different environment.
Let me ask an entirely different question:
Who is the 'nailer'?
I can help here because there is no 'nailer'. Superman is a myth, Bill.
Sure, against the powerless. It's "votes in the bag" to pop a guy growing pot for cancer victims. It is an honorable prosecution as well, yes?
Against powerful law breakers? Surely you jest.
It works just fine.
It works great.
I guess I didn't mention this but:
"Of course it would be small and easy to hide. Pick a frequency that beams well using a A bit harder to hide that a hand-gun, and ripping it out and
Why would removal be necessary? The transmitter isn't illegal. It isn't even considered immoral or even 'in poor taste'.
It is a weapon used against the powerless, so why wouldn't law enforcement and the courts be fully supportive of it if they were "officially" aware?
You believe that I speak in jest? I do not.
Let's say I specialize in installation and servicing of these tools. I know what they are for and I realize that in an enlightened society use of the tools would be considered assault and attempted murder; the users and I would be jailed for a long, long time.
So my first move is to keep my activities far 'off the books'. It's a cash deal only. My livelihood is dependent upon my disgression. Ask any drug supplier to the rich and famous (unless you are also convinced that they can never exist.)
Why would I dump into my own breakfast by squealing?
Yes, it is a problem which I am solving, fact by fact. :)
You don't think the innocent bystanders dropping like flies might be a problem? Besides, the store owner is likely to be the first to test it accidentally on himself. It's inevitable with such boobytraps.
The plantiff and the lawyer and the judge would all have to decide to end their careers at the same time. Would you agree they are much more likely to 'go along to get along' with a 50 billion dollar (resourceful and infinitely corrupt) corporation?
They would be smart to drop the case at the earliest possible moment, like a nanosecond after the victim's brother-in-law says "so why don't you sue?".
Not *everyone* will be targeted. The system might not be used for several days on end.
I might not have mentioned this, but:
"No collapses. Just frozen with temporary blindness and deafness. See, we are overwhelming a very complicated system with a bunch of 'nonsense data'. It is a 'Denial Of Service' attack, with the brain as a target instead of a computer."
The whole thing is over within a minute or two. The beauty is that our target is very likely to be technically unsophisticated and will downplay their nap because they will never guess what really happened.
1) What data set of 'servo controlled microwave booby traps' did you draw that conclusion from? Do you have links, please?
2) How could he be sitting in his office above the dining floor and simultaneously standing in front of the cash register?
ElectronDepot website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here.
All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.