Hi, I am having a little microwave experiment, and I want to shield some cracks from leaking microwaves. A friend said to me that a paper-type called "mica" is used for such reasons in microwave ovens. Actually what he told me is that it allows microwaves to pass through, but it blurs them so as they are not focused as before.
Is it true, or does anyone know any better way to make leaking microwaves less harmful (apart from Faraday cage, this is too hard for me to make, I suppose).
Mica is a mineral that naturally forms thin sheets. It used to be called "isinglass." Mica is an insulator, so it's transparent to RF; in thin-enough sheets, it's even transparent to light. In a microwave oven, what defocuses the microwaves is the fan in the cavity. As the blades rotate, they change the geometry of the cavity, so it flips between various resonant modes.
A Faraday cage is just a continuous conductive shell. It can have holes in it, as long as the holes are small relative to the wavelength of interest. The earliest microwave ovens had contact fingers around the door, to complete the cage. Current ones use a trick: the door overlaps the edge of the cavity and is _insulated_ from it. The length of the overlap is half of the operating wavelength, so the radiation encountering the crack sees a half-wave open transmission line. That looks like a dead short.
The thing is a classic experiment that proves that there is no ether. For various reasons we do not want to have microwaves leaking behind the surface they hit. I think the ideal for it would be some kind of material that "absorbs" the microwaves, as lead does for radiation. If you know such materials or have better ideas, it would be great to let me know.
At microwave (and lower) frequencies, the way to prevent EM radiation from penetrating a surface is to make the surface very conductive. Copper works; silver-plated copper works better, partly because of the lower resistivity of silver and partly because silver oxidizes slowly, and silver oxide is conductive. To make a microwave-proof enclosure, just make a Faraday cage and make sure that there is no crack that might act as a slot antenna. The "tuned seal" strategy used in microwave ovens works for a single frequency, but if you need to stop broadband radiation, there is no substitute for a continuous conductive shell.
Yes, there are surface treatments that absorb microwave energy instead of reflecting it. The best ones are military secrets, because their main use is to make things hard to detect by radar.
BTW, you do realize that "radiation" means more here than it does in the National Inquirer?
charcoal is also black at microwave wavelengths, it could take fairly thick panels, but it's cheap. The stuff will heat up as it absorbs energy.
-- Bye. Jasen
On the web I came across references to Velostat. Does anyone know if it absorbs microwaves and where may one get it from?
That's for guarding devices against ESD.
It is a 3M trademark for their antistaic products.
-- Service to my country? Been there, Done that, and I\'ve got my DD214 to prove it.
Good explanation, but one small error - it's a quarter wave line, not half wave.
See:
-- ----------------------------------------------------------------------- To reply to me directly:
Approximately what frequency?
I'm not sure that this is the best solution, but there are materials specially made for absorbing microwaves.
For example, see:
If you made the surface they hit a very large sheet of metal, most of the microwaves would be reflected and very little would leak behind the surface they hit.
Is there a good reason why you want to use microwaves rather than visible light?
-- ----------------------------------------------------------------------- To reply to me directly:
Oops. I _knew_ that. I plead temporary insanity due to caffeine deficiency.
Close to the frequency of the cooking microwaves.
I am interested in such microwave absorption materials.
Yes, the experiment that proves the non-existence of ether uses microwaves.
All that that proves the non-existence of is sufficient subtlety in the experimental protocol(s) to verify its existence.
Cheers! Rich
Are you experimenting with a microwave OVEN?!!! If so, I hope you know that ovens are extremely dangerous, since any significant microwave leakage will cause permanent blindness. It's called "RF cataracts."
If not an oven, then what is your microwave source? What wattage? And why do you think there might be leakage? Do you have a microwave meter to tell you the milliwatts of leakage?
When it comes to high power microwave radiation (watts and higher,) I would say that you MUST build a faraday cage. If you can't, then it's stupid to experiment with it.
Here's another way to say it: playing around with leaky microwave ovens is deeply stupid; much more stupid that playing with shotgun shells and a hammer.
Mica is transparent to microwave radiation. It's not a shield, it's a window. And no, mica does not "blur" microwaves. Your friend doesn't know what he's talking about. It's just there to keep the exploding spaghetti sauce from getting on the magnetron antenna and causing a short.
ElectronDepot website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.