Of course you have to be singularly ill-informed to misunderstand the data quite as thoroughly as John Larkin does.
The extra CO2 isn't greening the earth anything like thoroughly enough to reduce the CO2 levels back to the interglacial norm, and rising temperatures make prolonged hot spells more deadly than they used to be, while making cold spells less frequent, less intense and less deadly.
I wonder how John Larkin thinks he knows that?
John Larkin thinks he does, but what he posts suggests he evolves his circuits. Intelligent design doesn't seem to come int it.
Actually they enslaved the neighboring tribes and got them to work what used to be their fields, and pass on the excess food they generated to the collective.
After a while they reealised that calling the slaves "citizens", and the requistioned extra food "taxes" produced a better impression.
John Larkin can't possibly know that.
No support, so we know it's a lie.
You don't know a thing about it...nor about electronics design.
<crickets>800ppm CO2 in the atmosphere might be good for some plants, but the warmer climate that comes with it probably means that it wouldn't be good for the plants we rely on
John Larkin isn't actually guessing - he's being even sillier, in relying on climate change denial propaganda which has the sole aim of letting the fossil carbon extraction industry keep it's cash flow high for a few more years.
6000ppm CO2 levels date back to a time when the sun was appreciably smaller - it's surface was just as hot, but there was less of it, so it radiated less heat, and the earth needed a bigger greenhouse effect to run at a plant friendly surface temperature.
No humans then.
Inability to support your claims, and impermissible burden shifting, noted.
The name "Larkin" does not appear at that page.
Not a requirement. In fact, it marks a would-be Usenet participant as less worthy of participation.
No, the reason it's dying is because it attracts wheezy blowhards like you.
More accurate to say the Sun was dimmer. You might be right about the size, the big thing is the Sun keeps getting denser due to the ratio of hydrogen to helium changing due to fusion. The big thing is that life at the time had evolved for those conditions. What we care about is the conditions that we have evolved to prosper in, along with the ecosystem that supports us. Dave
<crickets>
I'm not interested in a URL wild goose chase, thanks.
You're a little more articulate than the typical Breitbart-lie-gobbling Trumpswabs, but your political thinking and understanding is not a whit higher than theirs.
Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.
Ask the community — no account required