a question about resistors in an arc experiment

Not really. At any applied potentional, the arc has a definite resistance, and that resistance is positive.

One could qualify comments about resistance by observing in each case that the resistance is positive, but since resistance is never negative, that would be redundant.

John Larking said "Most arcs have negative resistance, so the current increases without limit, unless there is series resistance elsewhere in the circuit" which is strange thing for someone to say if they understand the behaviour of components that have a negative resistance slope over part of their operating range. The effect of having a resistance is series is that a higher current reduces the potentioal across the arc. In its negative resistance region, this further increases the current. That is, the increasing current is caused by the presence of the series resistance, rather than being prevented by it.

Maybe John genuinely understood the meaning of negative resistance in this context, but I'm far from convinced, and people do have some strange notions at times.

Sylvia.

Reply to
Sylvia Else
Loading thread data ...

I see you're also well versed in french. :)

formatting link
"

Reply to
Jamie

Well, that just blew their 'AlwaysWrong' claim all to hell with a nuke.

Irreversibly stained, that claim is, I'd say.

Who knows? Maybe the Bulb is only bright for those that have full spectrum vision as opposed to fool spectrum vision.

You should see my forest fire fighting solutions. Mark my words... it ill be what gets used one day, whether I bring the idea 'to light' or not. I cannot believe it has not already been thought of.

Reply to
Archimedes' Lever

Yes. I note that your thick headedness increases without limit.

I cannot believe that you cannot see the flaw with your remark.

Reply to
Archimedes' Lever

And that, folks, is how we got our solar system. Good thing a lot of that Iron ended up in this hulking spheroid.

When the Cycles Of Time come back around again, you won't even know that you have already been here before. Oooops... too late for that.

Reply to
The Great Attractor

Except that *that* is not all that was wrong with his remark.

Reply to
Archimedes' Lever

Whatever.

Reply to
Rich Grise

I think you miss understood him.

It is very clear to me.

formatting link
"

Reply to
Jamie

It is obvious that he did think such a thing.

The 'dead short' of the two nodes between which any arc might occur, is the highest current value any source feeding it can provide. Separate the dead short and apply an arc, and you will NEVER get to that dead short resistance in free air. The arc goes to very nearly zero ohms, but not quite.

Both cases, however, will have very nearly the same current figure, and both will also likely cause the supply to fold back. IF the supply is made to sustain a specific current into a dead short, yet arc at HV when there is a gap, that arc will never be any more than that limit value for current.

The dead short will read zero volts across the shorted nodes, and the live arc will read whatever the sustaining voltage is to hit the current limit for whatever given arc gap (up to a point). So that one will read several kilovolts, and it will be very spikey. Make sure you use protections for instruments, etc.

Reply to
Archimedes' Lever

It NEVER "led to unlimited current".

Reply to
Archimedes' Lever

This is the reason why more of the element "burns away" before the circuit actually opens.

Reply to
Archimedes' Lever

Bwuahahahahahaha!

That arc had to originate from between two nodes of conductive media.

The current through a gap, filled by ANY medium (including plasma), will never be higher than those two nodes shorted together.

Reply to
Archimedes' Lever

Excellent and succinct. No one can argue with those scientific methodologies.

I used to make getter supplies, and flash lamp stimulus supplies.

Reply to
Archimedes' Lever

I have no idea what you are talking about.

Connect two fat wires to a hefty 120 volt outlet. Touch them together, very gently. Wear sunglasses. No matter how delicately you make the contact, you'll get an explosion; the higher the capacity of the supply circuit, the bigger the bang.

Try it.

Repeat with, say, a 10 ohm resistor in the circuit, like the iron. You then can touch the wires together, and then pull them apart, and maintain a stable arc, at least if the wire doesn't eventually heat up and melt. But there will be no current runaway, no explosion, no matter how many amps the outlet is good for. Positive net total resistance makes the current stable.

Try it.

That's electrical reality. The rest of the nonsense here is just a heap of words and people acting pissy about definitions.

John

Reply to
John Larkin

Crikey! Another nym! TURD!

...Jim Thompson

--
| James E.Thompson, P.E.                           |    mens     |
| Analog Innovations, Inc.                         |     et      |
| Analog/Mixed-Signal ASIC\'s and Discrete Systems  |    manus    |
| Phoenix, Arizona  85048    Skype: Contacts Only  |             |
| Voice:(480)460-2350  Fax: Available upon request |  Brass Rat  |
| E-mail Icon at http://www.analog-innovations.com |    1962     |

                   Liberals are so ignorant...
         They don\'t even know the definition of ignorant
Reply to
Jim Thompson

Right. When an EE says "negative resistance" he generally means some negative slope on the I:E curve. Things like "negative resistance region" and "negative resistance oscillator" are common. Phil Hobbs recently noted here that one can linearize a platinum RTD by connecting it across a negative resistance, and nobody was confused by that.

Most of us know that there are few true negative resistors in the Mouser catalog.

John

Reply to
John Larkin

You are the rest of the nonsense here.

Reply to
Archimedes' Lever

Lamefuck! Another pussy post! Uncivil fucktard!

Reply to
Archimedes' Lever

BULLSHIT

----[R]--------+-->

Reply to
Jasen Betts

Here's a minus one ohm resistor:

. 1 ohm . ___ . .---|___|-. . | | . -1 ohm --> | |\\| | . o--------o--|-\\ | . | >---| . .--|+/ | . | |/| | . | ___ | . o---|___|-' . | 1 ohm . .-. . | |1 ohm . | | . '-' . | . === . GND .

(created by AACircuit v1.28.6 beta 04/19/05

formatting link

--

John Devereux
Reply to
John Devereux

ElectronDepot website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.