10 guilty men v 1 innocent man

May 08, 2010 8 Replies

On May 5, 8:26=A0pm, "Paul Hovnanian P.E." wrote: PH > "Its better to let 10 guilty men go free PH > than to convict one innocent man."



I wish that axiom was still clung to, but our system threw that out DECADES ago.



There might be some veneer or pretense that says that, but in general practice, no.



In Child Protection cases they skirt the issue of conviction while trampling Liberty interests that are even MORE sacred than the Liberty interest against mere jail/prison time.



The socialist Social Worker busy bodies violate that axiom ten times over, all in the name of ""protecting"" children.


95% of their cases are BS makework crap.
4% are Meth heads, amd the ""Child Protection"" cases that involve what the general public would consider to be child abuse are LESS than 1% of the cases where they remove children from their parents.

CPS agencies kill more kids than they save. Injure more than they rescue.



They create more broken teens, create more child molester monsters, make more able bodied teens into uneducated non-producers and turn lots of non-victims into people obsessed with being victims.



The ""Child Protection"" INDUSTRY is easily a bigger threat to America than any terrorist group.



But here, or for other crimes, the damage that might be caused by letting he guilty go free could be pretty serious. So that's their motivation.

In the grand scheme of things, letting a few latinos get away with mowing lawns or washing dishes just won't justify the inconvenience I'll have to put up with.

And making illegals fear contact with law enforcement will just make them easier prey for criminals.

Paul Hovnanian mailto:Paul@Hovnanian.com ------------------------------------------------------------------ Happily doing the work of 3 Men ... Moe, Larry & Curly

"Paul Hovnanian P.E." wrote in news: snipped-for-privacy@Hovnanian.com:

Then they should go back to their own country.

Besides,they already ARE criminals;FELONS,for entering the US illegally.

Criminals SHOULD fear contact with law enforcement.

Jim Yanik jyanik at localnet dot com

Those who live far from the border don't seem to understand the size & scope of the problem. It's not just a couple--half the kids in my SIL's elementary classroom (in a non-Hispanic area) were non-english- speaking kids of illegals. The local legal kids were consigned to the other half.

In effect she had two separate classrooms packed into one, and had to teach each separately, cutting instruction for both in half.

That's a formula for disaster, which it pretty much was.

Also, the state pays roughly $12k a year per kid for that...it's an expensive disaster. That's for schools--now imagine the load on the emergency rooms, social services, etc.

James Arthur

In the grand scheme of things, illegals crossing the border are jumping in line ahead of those waiting legal entry. They don't care about you or me, they just care about getting there first and making others wait. And illegals fearing contact with law enforcement is nothing new, since criminals have always feared contact with law enforcement.

So, what else is new?

What should be *new* is how we handle the bastards.

Men and women and families get returned as normal.

Drug dealers, coyotes, and criminals become buzzard food.

Break the neck, and launch carcass to other side of fence as a reminder to those that are still over there.

Presumption of innocence is only for citizens.

False entry into our land (border incursion) is a CRIME, and presumption of guilt is the order of the day!

A great man, I believe it was Samuel Johnson, once said "Patriotism is the last refuge of an utter imbecile"."

"Name-calling is the last refuge of leftists" ...Jim Thompson

| James E.Thompson, CTO | mens | | Analog Innovations, Inc. | et | | Analog/Mixed-Signal ASIC's and Discrete Systems | manus | | Phoenix, Arizona 85048 Skype: Contacts Only | | | Voice:(480)460-2350 Fax: Available upon request | Brass Rat | | E-mail Icon at http://www.analog-innovations.com | 1962 | The only thing bipartisan in this country is hypocrisy

Or utter Nymbecile, as is the case here.

Join the Discussion

Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.

Didn't find your answer?

Ask the community — no account required