2N8055 equivalent

"Bob G0KYF"




**  You sure about those numbers ???

 Google gives no hits for 2N8055 and the TO2 pack is incredibly obsolete.





............   Phil

Hi Phil,

have you got a pic of a TO2? its not in my 1984 Towers transistor
selector (3rd ed.) - T01, T01H, T03....

Nor, of course, is the 2N8055

Cheers
Terry

"Terry Given"




**  There is an outline drawing of a TO2  ( aka W113) pack in my Semicon
Index, 7th ed, 1977.

The drawing shows a circle with the three leads forming an equilateral
triangle in the centre.

SGS/ATES  of the  UK  used it for the AT210,  a 250mW PNP germanium.





............     Phil

Thanx. Guess my Towers just aint old enough....its certainly tatty enough

Cheers
Terry

Google is hardly first thing to do regarding hands-on electronics....
I am fairly sure he red 3055 as 8055.
Just use your built in google :-)

"hadda hadda"




  ** Bullshit.





**  First thing I thought of  -  but there is no dealer on the planet who
does NOT sell the 2N3055.

 There is a small plastic device with the number " 8055  " in a TO92
variant.

 Over to the OP for a better description.




...........   Phil

You could misread 2N3055 into 8055?
2N3055 was the most popular for decades!

"hadda hadda" <draw.hotmail.com> wrote



Google is hardly first thing to do regarding hands-on electronics....
I am fairly sure he red 3055 as 8055.
Just use your built in google :-)

***So where did the TO2 come from???

Brian Goldsmith.

sorry TO3 not TO2 just a typo.
but definately 8055. found a listing using altavista search engine but no
more details.

**8055 maybe, but surely not 2N8055?

You need to be VERY certain about the prefix.

"Bob G0KYF"




**  You are very likely looking at a code number applied by the equipment
maker.

You will have to work out what is needed in the way of a  TO3 power
transistor to replace the one/s you have by using electronic circuit theory.

Sorry  -  I cannot direct you to any suppliers of that either.




............   Phil

Phil Allison wrote:



Sounds like the date code for wk 55 of 1980 to me.


Graham

On Sat, 19 Mar 2005 22:34:30 +0000, Pooh Bear
composed:



Yeah, that was a very long leap year. :-)


- Franc Zabkar

On Sat, 19 Mar 2005 22:34:30 +0000, Pooh Bear





There are only 52 weeks in a year

On Sat, 19 Mar 2005 22:34:30 +0000, Pooh Bear


I missed previous messages. Maybe just a 3055 ?

Pieter

"Alan Rutlidge




**  The *only*  good thing that can be said about criminal arse bandit POS
like the Rutmaniac is they do not breed.






............    Phil

minimal

No prizes for seconds Phil.  FFS try to come up with something original for
a change.  You are more boring than bat shit.

I'd say it was a natural reaction to no-fault divorce/child
custody/maintenance payments/limited access etc.
The obvious group with less to worry about are those on welfare.

MrT.