Sorry, but the difference in time heating 4 quarts of water in a 1kW vat is NOT 3 times that of the 3kW unit.
There are constraints. The water has to still be there when you are done.
If it takes a 1kW unit to heat it to boil in ten minutes, there is no way in hell a 3kW unit will do it in three.
It is NOT linear, chucko.
Didn't find your answer? Ask the community — no account required.
D
Dave Plowman (News)
Still a better insulator than the sort of metals kettles would otherwise be made of, though, which was the point.
Think you're missing the point that the water restricts the maximum temperature.
*If you try to fail, and succeed, which have you done?
Dave Plowman dave@davenoise.co.uk London SW
To e-mail, change noise into sound.
D
Dave Plowman (News)
You do pasta in a kettle? Have you some secret way of getting it to align so it can be poured?
You've found a source of open kettles then? Is this a US thing? I don't think they would conform to UK H&S regs. Do you dip the cup into them to get the boiling water out?
*You! Off my planet!
Dave Plowman dave@davenoise.co.uk London SW
To e-mail, change noise into sound.
D
Dave Plowman (News)
So use a proper electric kettle. That will save your gas bill.
*There's no place like www.home.com *
Dave Plowman dave@davenoise.co.uk London SW
To e-mail, change noise into sound.
D
Dave Plowman (News)
Go on then Einstein, show the maths to prove this.
*Why do we say something is out of whack? What is a whack?
Dave Plowman dave@davenoise.co.uk London SW
To e-mail, change noise into sound.
S
Spurious Response
Bullshit. It would cost me twice as much to boil my water with your kettle as it would with my gas and stove-top 2 quart saucepan.
Also, if your kettles have exposed coils in them, folks won't likely be putting their pasta into them.
S
Spurious Response
Basic inline water heaters prove it. If it were so much faster, we would have 3kW inline water heaters. As it stands, that it not the case.
Sure, as you increase power, you get more work done. But you also lose more of that heat as well.
What it really comes down to is the diameter (and length) of the coil.
Since both 1kW as well as 3kW coils BOTH reach temperatures far above the boiling temp of water, it would seem to me that you would foresee some point at which there are diminishing returns from the amount of energy one dumps into those coils over the return of heat imparted into the water.
I'd bet that a larger diameter coil will heat the water faster than a smaller diameter coil, for any given equal wattage, and the reason is that the coil surface area is so much larger, yet it's surface temp is very much the same.
So to me, the ideal heater for water would be one that does the job with the least amount of energy in a reasonable time.
D
Dave Plowman (News)
I'd love to see your proof. A 'two quart' saucepan will have *vast* heat losses. A decent electric kettle can cope with just one cupful of water if that's all that's needed.
Did you put soap in the kettle as a kid too?
*I don't have a solution, but I admire your problem. *
Dave Plowman dave@davenoise.co.uk London SW
To e-mail, change noise into sound.
D
Dave Plowman (News)
Having had experience of a 1kW electric kettle I can tell you it doesn't take a 'reasonable' time.
*Sticks and stones may break my bones but whips and chains excite me*
Dave Plowman dave@davenoise.co.uk London SW
To e-mail, change noise into sound.
T
Thomas Tornblom
On the contrary. It is very efficient as it is *only* the cookware that heats up.
Did you miss the 84% vs 40% for gas efficiency paragraph?
Most cookware sold today in Sweden is induction compatible, and have been for quite a while. Even though we don't have have an induction stove today I believe most of our cookware is compatible.
What type of cookware would you miss out on?
I would say you have no clue.
They started out in restaurant kitchens many years ago and they have several advantages:
1) super quick cooking as no heat needs to be transfered to the cookware, it is the cookware itself that gets heated, quite similar to a microwave where the food itself generates the heat
2) much less losses, which reduces the cooling needed i the kitchen
3) easy and quick regulation
4) safe, the stove top doesn't hot, other than by transfer from the cookware.
I recommend following the link to this page:
formatting link
to see the pros and cons.
T
Tam/WB2TT
This must be a cultural thing, but I have no idea what in hell you are talking about.
You use a spaghetti strainer. And yes, some things need an open kettle.
Tam
D
Dave Plowman (News)
Join the club. My stupid reply was in response to the stupid comment from Spurious response.
Thinks. In the UK a kettle is only used for boiling water. Usually for making tea or instant coffee. Do you guys call some form of general cooking utensil a kettle too?
*Isn't it a bit unnerving that doctors call what they do "practice?"
Dave Plowman dave@davenoise.co.uk London SW
To e-mail, change noise into sound.
M
Malcolm Moore
I think this may be the problem. From
"In the United Kingdom, Ireland, and Canada, a kettle is a device used to quickly heat water for hot drinks, such as tea or instant coffee. It is normally constructed out of durable plastic or steel (with a plastic handle) and powered by mains electricity."
and
"In the United States, a kettle usually refers to the stovetop metallic version with a steam whistle.
Elsewhere in the world (and sometimes in the United Kingdom) the word kettle can refer to a metal pot for boiling or stewing, and a kettle is probably the most ancient kind of metal cooking utensil.
The word kettle originates from Latin catillus, which in various contexts is translated as bowl, deep dish, or funnel."
Perhaps SR is cooking pasta in something like a Kettle Drum :-)
-- Regards Malcolm Remove sharp objects to get a valid e-mail address
J
Jasen Betts
Of course not! it'd take three and twentyy seconds.
for a heating element immersed in the water it is almost exactly linear, do the math.
Bye. Jasen
J
Jasen Betts
Only 3KW? why would someone want a toy like that?
do the math... heat is the one form of energy tat can always be produced electrically with 100% efficiency.
convection, and bubbling, will stir the water, a cappucino machine will heat a mug of milk in only a few seconds - the steam jet is good for over ten kilowatts.
faster is generally more efficient.
Bye. Jasen
J
Jasen Betts
16.4c here (0.128 USD)
Bye. Jasen
J
Jasen Betts
polypropylene is commonly used, look it up.
bullshit.
Bye. Jasen
J
Jasen Betts
actually polypropylene is a slightly worse heat conductor than most other thermoplastics :) this guy is just spurious.
Bye. Jasen
H
Hal Murray
formatting link
I found that while looking for this
formatting link
It goes around a pot to get better heat transfer.
These are my opinions, not necessarily my employer's. I hate spam.
S
Spurious Response
Except that you cannot place your veggies in there, or any other cooking need.
Some people do more than drink tea. We use continuously boiling water for many cooking needs, and those are the only needs I have, and my cup of tea works just fine with water that only takes a few minutes to boil over a trickle flame.
I know how to apply heat to a surface and waste very little.
Join the Discussion
Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.
Didn't find your answer?
Ask the community — no account required
Report Content
You are reporting this content to the moderators. They will look at it
ASAP.