Do you have experience with "infrared camera detection" on mobile devices?

Go away.

Hi Snit,

Why do these two prove, in _every_ post, they own the brain of a child? o Fox's Mercantile (*also known as "Snit"*) o newshound

Just like last time, the time before that and the time before that.

You're convinced I'm Snit. I'm not.

What do you do? Jack off in front of your computer thinking how clever you are?

Nothing found on the Play store.

There's nothing by techno95 remaining on the Google Play Store. However, you can get the APK if you want to live dangerously:

Let us know when you find a URL that I can use for these. Like most people, I don't like to waste my time Googling for things that you could easily provide as a URL.

While you're looking, consider that finding a hidden camera requires that the camera emits something that you can detect with your smartphone. That limits it to RF emissions of some sort, magnetic emissions from the lens auto focus electronics, or IR emissions from some manner of illuminator. You might to better with a spectrum analyzer (or RTL-SDR dongle) and look for the camera clock oscillator, LAN clock frequency, or RF backhaul frequency. CCTV cameras are often powered by 24VAC. Maybe look for a 60Hz AC power field where one would normally not be expected.

Another detector for a hidden camera lens is the reflective LED method. You wear a headdress of LEDs facing outwards just above your eyes and if you see bright point reflections then you may have found your hidden camera (lens)...

This was explored in the book by Cory Doctorow "Little Brother"

John :-#)#

Big mistake placing your call sign in your sig.

If you're going to get into arguments with people on Usenet, there are some very mean people who will look you up in the FCC call sign registry and cause you and your family immense problems. They can go to a site such as Intelius and with their credit card learn the entire public record of your life. It has happened again and again on Usenet, and they guy you're screwing with is one of the sock puppets of a guy who does such a thing. An American Indian named Eagle made that same mistake with his call sign. They drove him off from Usenet with threats to his entire family. Others have suffered the same fate.

It's probably a bit late, but If I were you I'd drop that call sign from your sig file.

I apologize that the app I used is no longer in Google Play.

This is what the "green screen" IR detector screen looks like: That's actually an infrared camera it's pointed at, but it's apparently off (likely as wires pulled out when the tree fell down in a windstorm).

Here, for the record, is what the "magnetometer" readout looks like with the results in both cases when pressed next to radios: It glows red when you're close to an RF emitter of various sorts:

I apologize. Let me use a few apps in my "system" folder to check. Apparently I installed version 1.9 of that app on November 9th, 2018.

1. This is what "My Apps" freeware shows about that app: o

1. This is what "List My Apps" freeware shows about that app: o

2. This is what "My App List" freeware shows about that app: o

1. This is what "Applications Info" freeware shows about that app: o

2. This is what my.own.apps freeware shows (but it's obnoxiousware): o My Apps

1. This is what mobi.usage.appbackup freeware shows about that app: o App Backup & Restore

I agree with you that the one I used is no longer easy to find. Luckily there are plenty of "hidden camera detectors" on Google Play:

I tested FOUR of them for you, where I recommend the LAST one below.

Here is one called "Hidden Camera Detector". Here it is in use inside my house (I will test it outside later): That app has ads; but it seems otherwise the same as the old one I have.

Here's another one called "Hidden Camera Detector". Here it is in use inside my house (notice it uses a "blue screen"): The magnetometer seems to give slightly more dynamic data:

Here is a lousy sophomoric one called "Anti-Spy:Came Detector" It has obnoxious ads; but otherwise, it seems the same as mine. (I don't recommend this app due to the obnoxities.)

Here is one called "Hidden Camera Detector Camera Scanner": This one uses a "pink viewfinder" & a dial gauge magnetometer: The magnetometer, like the others, displays what it thinks it sees: This one seems to have an additional separate graphing function:

Of all those, I like the one I have best since it has zero ads! But of the ones that are available now, that last one is OK.

One thing I noticed in testing that I didn't realize is that the "Green Screen" is immaterial. I don't know WHY they change the color of the screen (do you?).

Some are green. Some are blue. Some red. Why bother changing the color?

I think the apps all look for the same thing: o Magnetometer readings, or, o They just let the IR-sensitive camera do its normal thing.

I "guess" they make the screen "green or red or blue" to give more contrast? I'm not sure. Do you know why they change the screen color?

I'm not a professional; I just hike in rough terrain where bad guys are. That is, I happen to often hike in the hills where pot farmers grow stuff.

I find their "stuff" all the time, fertilizer, hoses, dams, irrigation tubing, and even hammocks, sleeping bags, weighing scales, car batteries, etc.

It's very common in these inaccessible mountain areas.

Here's just a bunch of horticulture pots I found yesterday while hiking at least two or three miles from the nearest road deep off the trails.

Whenever I see _that_ stuff, I know the pot farmers are nearby. I just want to see if they have hidden cameras in the trees.

Nice idea. My initial guess(tm) was that the anti-reflective coating on the camera lens would umm... not reflect anything: The instructions are value and ambiguous. It took me a while to decode how it is intended to be used.

The purpose of the toilet paper tube is prevent the user from seeing the direct light from the flashlight. In order to get a tolerable reflection, the flashlight should be close and parallel to the toilet paper tube. Once I did that, I was able to see reflections from some of my various cameras, but also reflections from anything shiny in the house. The lenses that did not reflect light were those with clear plastic lens protectors, which reflected nothing no matter what I tried. Actually, there was plenty of light scattering, but nothing that could be seen as a reflected spot. That eliminated some of my laptop web cameras and outdoor security cameras. How well it works in the field, I don't know. Probably better than inside my house because of the lack of spurious reflections.

It's the retroreflection from the surface of the image sensor that you see, like a cat's eye in the dark. If the sensor is at the focus of the lens, the reflection goes straight back to the light source.

Cheers

Phil Hobbs

Hi Snit,

You already _admitted_ you were Snit, long ago, and even if you now deny what you long ago admitted, what matters is that you _reek_ of Snit.

You, Fox's Mercantile, just as when you post as Snit ... o Prove that you provide _negative_ value in _every_ post.

You just proved the veracity of that fact in this very thread, for example. o And in the next thread. o And the next. o And next... (ad infinitum)

You've never even _once_ contributed an iota of on-topic value o To _any_ thread!

I don't have to prove this, since you prove it yourself every time you post o For example, in this very thread.

You, Snit (aka Fox's Mercantile), _can't_ add value o The reason is that you have a left-side-of-mount-stupid DK mind

You, Fox's Mercantile, posted this _idiotic_ video, for example: (Fox's Mercantile video)

Fox's Mercantile (aka Snit) can't comprehend that he can't comprehend: o Fox's Mercantile _never_ even once _looked_ at the Y-axis!

That's how _stupid_ you prove to be, Fox's Mercantile - every time! o Whether you post as Fox's Mercantile - or whether you post as Snit