Anyone have experience/recommendations for wireless ways to distribute HDMI to multiple TV sets? ...Jim Thompson
-- | James E.Thompson | mens | | Analog Innovations | et | | Analog/Mixed-Signal ASIC's and Discrete Systems | manus | | San Tan Valley, AZ 85142 Skype: skypeanalog | | | Voice:(480)460-2350 Fax: Available upon request | Brass Rat | | E-mail Icon at
formatting link
| 1962 | I love to cook with wine. Sometimes I even put it in the food.
Didn't find your answer? Ask the community — no account required.
R
rickman
I haven't tried it yet, but many newer sets have WiDi which is HDMI over WiFi. It may require Windows 8. I think my laptop has it, but I don't have a TV, so I haven't tried it. I'm going to a friend's house today, maybe I'll try it there.
Rick
D
DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno
I would buy a single HTPC "Home Theater PC" for each display, then, they could all each have their own individually controlled/chosen stream. Use a wifi router with an NAS attached or a wifi NAS.
Then, you can also "fill up" the NAS "multimedia server" from any of various sources as well.
The Single PCs could be an ARM processed machine running Android and KODI, or Debian and KODI or "OpenELEC and KODI. KODI is a home theater interface app. It used to be XBMC. It will run under Windows, but Windows costs money and reduces security.
The rooted Android version is a common route. Indestructible on ARM devices, for the most part.
These are nice:
formatting link
Or at about $300 each, you could get a real, intel based PC at each location, such as:
formatting link
Black/dp/B00CO2Z854
Way more expensive per display, but far more versatile. They are each a PC at that point, and you can use them for room appliance control, etc. They usually come with Windows, as you can tell from the price.
J
Joe Chisolm
Look at the IOGEAR GW3DHDKIT. I have not tried it yet but giving it serious consideration.
Chisolm
Republic of Texas
D
DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno
That allows you to pipe one single HDMI source only stream over a proprietary wireless link to one receiver. Additional receivers are nearly $200 each too. Not very flexible.
My idea uses standard industry networking technology (wifi) and each node is as cheap as $135.
D
DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno
The Rpi sucks at full HD streaming playback, however.
There are severeal other subpar elements of that OLD design as well.
And the cubox does it at less than 5 watts fully pushed.
Ooops.
W
whit3rd
Actually, many Blu-ray players now come with wired or WiFi network connections; aren't they a lot less than $135?
M
Michael Black
Though watch out. My found on the sidewalk blu0ray player has ethernet and USB, but the manual claims it can be only used with the company's USB wifi adapter. I suspect that's not completely true, but probably is limited to whatever uses the same driver as the company's unit. So if it doesn't have built in wifi, one may have to pay the price for their wifi adapter.
Michael
J
Jim Thompson
Have you tried it yet? ...Jim Thompson
-- | James E.Thompson | mens | | Analog Innovations | et | | Analog/Mixed-Signal ASIC's and Discrete Systems | manus | | San Tan Valley, AZ 85142 Skype: skypeanalog | | | Voice:(480)460-2350 Fax: Available upon request | Brass Rat | | E-mail Icon at
formatting link
| 1962 | I love to cook with wine. Sometimes I even put it in the food.
D
DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno
On Sat, 21 Feb 2015 12:38:51 +0100 (CET), Nomen Nescio Gave us:
Yes but rpi does NOT do 1080 HDMI very good... if at all.
D
DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno
On Tue, 24 Feb 2015 13:47:54 -0800 (PST), whit3rd Gave us:
They pump the disc playback, not your desired source.
W
whit3rd
Not true, they support TCP/IP streaming downloads. Serving up a suitable source, of course, may be a small matter of software... see, for instance,
Join the Discussion
Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.
Didn't find your answer?
Ask the community — no account required
Report Content
You are reporting this content to the moderators. They will look at it
ASAP.