By where it comes from. A phase shift has some reactive element that actually shifts the phase. A polarity inversion comes from, say, a center-tapped transformer or an inverting amplifier.
If it's done with a phase shifter, then yes, it's phase shifted. Otherwise, (CT Transformer, inverting amp) it's simply a polarity inversion.
Admittedly, it's a terminology thing, but sloppiness in expression leads to sloppy thinking.
--- If you're talking about a particular individual, a proper noun should follow the comma and be followed by a comma.
For example: "Screw you, Jack, who can't learn English."
On the other hand, if you're demeaning a group, the comma is superfluous.
In either case, it seems you're using the "screw you" epithet in a negative sense, implying that the screwer is causing the screwee to be looked on with disdain.
clear--metals are lossful near plasma/Debye scale, whereas diaelèctrèts can be perfect mirrors or conductors for a wonted band.
It does not:
formatting link
By the way, - is a glottal stop.
You don't! I had something to ask.
-----------------------
--------------
I looked at your "self" reference. It is too bad for you that it starts with some technical discussion regarding power systems and transmission lines between myself and someone I respect. You wisely stayed away from this so you did not show your ignorance of the topic. You finally came to life to "correct" the use of English. OOPS!, "muttish"
At that time you were asked if you had anything useful to say. You didn't. You still don't.
I use modern English not something supposed to be English based on Old Saxon which has no words (nor needed them) for modern physics and engineering concepts. Oh well, you can invent, as you have, your own language to cover this lack of foresight of our ancestors on the basis that obscurity hides meaning. This is something commonly expressed as "Bullshit Baffles Brains" If you have something to ask- do so in clear "modern English" ( you have mastered one of the idiomatic uses of "screw" even if you haven't mastered one of the idiomatic uses of "nice" so you can do so if you try).
As for your comments/questions(sic) on power transmission lines
"clear--longer wavelengths are toward DC." Wow, what a revelation! Hertz is rolling over in his grave!
"clear--metals are lossful near plasma/Debye scale, whereas diaelèctrèts can be perfect mirrors or conductors for a wonted band."
0) wonted-->wanted? Lossful-> lossy?
1) define "diaelèctrèts" (oh dear, you are going back to Greek with French accents) as opposed in properties to electrets and why you think they are useful.
2) what has the "plasma/Debye" scale have to do with the topic? It appears that you are trying to regurgitate something that isn't actually applicable to dress up the fact that metallic conductors have losses- which is a fact of life.
3) it appears that you have no concepts of what is important in transmitting hundreds of MW over hundreds of Km (but a fraction of a wavelength). Losses, while not desired, are a relatively minor problem. and excellent estimations of important line performance can be found by ignoring losses (e.g. for a 500KV line the effect on the magnitude of the characteristic impedance is about 0.1 % which is well within the error limits of the calculated data (Based on a particular case of a 500KV line where Zo =271-j9.7 ohms=271.2 @ 2 degrees full transposition assumed)
In sci.physics.electromag Benj wrote: (snip, someone wrote)
You mean superfluid?
The other famous (watch Apollo 13 for this one) cryogenic liquid state is supercritical. That is, above the critical point.
Apollo had fans in the oxygen tanks, as it is difficult to measure the amount remaining in the tank. A short in the power wires for the fan caused the explosion. (Previously it wasn't known that teflon would burn in supercritical oxygen.)
ElectronDepot website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here.
All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.