1. Home
  2. Hobby Electronics Basics
  3. DC Wave Questions
  4. Page 17

DC Wave Questions

You mentioned the behavior of L and C, which refers to the way the *component* represented by C and the *component* represented by L react. It is in your context that I used the term L. Now, apparently, you have changed the context to exclude consideration of the component (which will sometimes lead to incorrect analysis) and to restrict the term to have it refer to the property only. Therefore, we did not refer to the same thing with the term L.

What I referred to is a circuit element that can saturate, as per the definition for inductance.

formatting link
"1. The property of an electric circuit by which an electromotive force is induced in it as the result of a changing magnetic flux. 2. A circuit element, typically a conducting coil, in which electromotive force is generated by electromagnetic induction."

I don't know where you came up with the above "rules" or whatever you want to call them. If, in solving a problem with an inductance, (specifically in this case, the effects of DC on an R,L,C load impedance) no consideration is given to saturation, the solution can be erroneous. Very specifically for the op's question, the possibility of saturation *must* be considered, even though the question did not include the word inductor. I think those rules, or whatever you call them, are not correct.

Ed

Reply to
ehsjr
Loading thread data ...

--- Had you bothered to get off of your fat, lazy ass and checked the origin of the thread you might have discovered that it started on sed where the OP asked for a five minute timer.

Since sed is a text-only newsgroup I advised the OP that I'd have a solution for him which I'd post to abse, (where binaries are allowed to be posted) then when I posted, I used the same subject as in sed in order to keep some continuity, but indicated that the _thread_ came from sed. Not the _post_, pinhead, the thread. The clue should have been that since the post had a binary attached to it, it _couldn't_ have come from sed

---

--- Maybe now that I've spelled it out for you you can figure it out.

-- John Fields Professional Circuit Designer

Reply to
John Fields

Askoxford says this:

The equivalent is misandrist (a person who hates persons of the male sex), a rare word but seemingly much sought-after. The corresponding noun for the attitude is misandry.

They also spell the above word 'misogynist'.

Reply to
Lord Garth

339 posts so far (including this one) and zero content... just the usual infantile squabbling.

John

Reply to
John Larkin

But of course... :-)

Tom

Reply to
Tom MacIntyre

Some people can't spell, and some people can't be nice. Luck of the draw, as you point out.

Too bad newsreaders don't include a nice-checker. The simplest implementation would just be a reverse spell-checker, that deleted words like asshole and idiot and churl. Some people's posts would get a *lot* shorter.

John

Reply to
John Larkin 

--
But a lot more confusing.  Yours would read like this:

"Too bad newsreaders don\'t include a nice-checker. The simplest
implementation would just be a reverse spell-checker, that deleted
words like and and. Some people\'s posts would get
a *lot* shorter."  ;)
Reply to
John Fields

On Sun, 19 Jun 2005 10:37:29 -0500, John Fields Gave us:

Grow the f*ck up, retard.

Note that you STILL likely don't know the meaning of the word cited.

I rest my case. The misogynistic idiot just got trivial... again. Oh... that's right, he never was anything BUT trivial.

Reply to
TokaMundo

On Sun, 19 Jun 2005 10:50:43 -0700, John Larkin Gave us:

And to think that it all started, because the John misogynistic idiot tried to play spell checker... again.

I did post on topic in this thread, btw...

Reply to
TokaMundo

It could just replace the missing words with an equal number of underscores so you can fill in the blanks. ;-)

--
Former professional electron wrangler.

Michael A. Terrell
Central Florida
Reply to
Michael A. Terrell

On Sun, 19 Jun 2005 13:08:52 -0500, John Fields Gave us:

You could be a bit more retarded, but I do not see how.

Reply to
TokaMundo

Not a common word, but there is "misandrist".

Best regards, Spehro Pefhany

--
"it\'s the network..."                          "The Journey is the reward"
speff@interlog.com             Info for manufacturers: http://www.trexon.com
Embedded software/hardware/analog  Info for designers:  http://www.speff.com
Reply to
Spehro Pefhany 

--
Well, since I know the meanings of _all_ of the words in your little
diatribe,  the likelihood of your being right is vanishingly small.  

Also, even though you wrote it, you obviously don\'t know the meaning
of _cite_, since you didn\'t.  LOL, the more you write the farther your
foot goes down your throat!
Reply to
John Fields 

--
If you don\'t see how, and you set yourself up as the arbiting
authority, then you can\'t, logically, make the inference.
Reply to
John Fields

Actually, he was being a bit clever, but you choose to criticize anyway, just because it's him posting, I have to assume.

Tom

Reply to
Tom MacIntyre

On Sun, 19 Jun 2005 15:10:43 -0500, John Fields Gave us:

What "myso" error? You are wrong again, asswipe.

Reply to
TokaMundo

BTW...I did mean for that to be choose (present tense), not chose (past tense). :-)

Tom

Reply to
Tom MacIntyre

On Sun, 19 Jun 2005 15:10:43 -0500, John Fields Gave us:

You are an idiot. You jump on others for spelling like a wussified little school marm, yet you choose to not spell several of your written "words". You are a true idiot, and I caught you. That is about all there is to it.

Unfamiliar with everyday colloquialisms now as well? I am not surprised.

Wrong again, asswipe. Fuck off and die now, little boy. You are proof that numerical age does not a man make.

Reply to
TokaMundo

The only components which can be represented by a single parameter L or C are ideal components, which will always have exactly that value. They can't saturate, because their value is mathematically constant. Though you probably can't buy them at digi-key ;-) Compents that you can buy cannot be represented by a single constant parameter, though you may be able to approximate them as such for a useful range of operation.

Not sure about this, but can the air-core inductor you just descrived saturate? Or is it primarily a funtion of a core material like iron or ferrite saturating?

Reply to
cs_posting 

--
You seem to find fault with my characterization of your behavior as
that of a spoiled female brat, yet your use of "wussified" casts
apersions on women since since "wussi" is a cowardly  aspersion to
"pussy", something with which you obviously have no experience and
which you need to address if you want to have anything to do with the
future.  

As for the rest of it, about the only thing you could catch is a cold,
dumbass, and not being able to spell isn\'t your only problem.
Specifically, in the thread where pure inductance was being compared
to the inductance of an inductor, it took you a couple of takes  to
understand what was going on and, even then, you had to pretend that
it was you who was in charge with your "you\'re right" shit.
Reply to
John Fields

ElectronDepot website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.